Jump to content

Hadith al-Manzila: Difference between revisions

m
no edit summary
imported>Bahrami
No edit summary
imported>Bahrami
mNo edit summary
Line 39: Line 39:
Some Sunni scholars have questioned the source of this hadith and have considered it among the sole sources (akhbar al-ahad)<ref>For example, see Amidi, P.167</ref>.
Some Sunni scholars have questioned the source of this hadith and have considered it among the sole sources (akhbar al-ahad)<ref>For example, see Amidi, P.167</ref>.


[[Shi'a]] scholars have answered that, "Indeed this hadith is authentic and frequently narrated and according to hadith scholars this hadith is among "most authentic prophet's traditions and most established sources" and even al-Dhahabi, a great Sunni scholar, has approved this hadith in his ''Talkhis al-mustadrak''. If this hadith were not authentic, it would not be mentioned in [[Sahih al-Bukhari]] and [[Sahih Muslim]]. Moreover, [[Mu'awiya]] who was a fierce enemy of Imam 'Ali (a) who had ordered others to insult and curse [[Imam 'Ali (a)]] and to invent hadith against him, not only accepted this hadith but also narrated it.<ref>Ibn Hajar al-Haythami, P. 179</ref>
[[Shi'a]] scholars have answered that, "Indeed this hadith is authentic and frequently narrated and according to hadith scholars this hadith is among "most authentic prophet's traditions and most established sources" and even al-Dhahabi, a great Sunni scholar, has approved this hadith in his ''Talkhis al-mustadrak''. If this hadith were not authentic, it would not be mentioned in [[Sahih al-Bukhari]] and [[Sahih Muslim]]. Moreover, [[Mu'awiya]] who was a fierce enemy of Imam 'Ali (a) who had ordered others to insult and curse [[Imam 'Ali (a)]] and to invent hadith against him, not only accepted this hadith but also narrated it.<ref>Ibn Hajar al-Haytami, P. 179</ref>


'''Second Question'''
'''Second Question'''
Anonymous user