Anonymous user
Muhammad b. Jarir al-Tabari al-Saghir: Difference between revisions
Muhammad b. Jarir al-Tabari al-Saghir (view source)
Revision as of 16:35, 4 February 2016
, 4 February 2016no edit summary
imported>S.J.Mosavi m (full-edit-) |
imported>S.J.Mosavi mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{under construction}} | {{under construction}} | ||
:::''{{Other people|Muhammad b. Jarir al-Tabari}}'' | :::''{{Other people|Muhammad b. Jarir al-Tabari}}'' | ||
''Muḥammad b. Jarīr al-Ṭabarī''' known as '''al-Tabari al-Saghir''' or '''al-Tabari, the Third''' is a disputed | ''Muḥammad b. Jarīr al-Ṭabarī''' known as '''al-Tabari al-Saghir''' or '''al-Tabari, the Third''' is a disputed person who some [[Rijal]] scholars have considered to be the author of ''[[Dala'il al-imama]]''. There are arguments among scholars on the historical existence of such a person and each group of scholars proposes their own justifications. Those who have accepted his existence based on the evidences mentioned in ''Dala'il al-imma'' have considered him among the scholars contemporary with [[al-Shaykh al-Tusi]] and [[al-Najashi]], most likely has lived in [[Baghdad]]. | ||
== Views on Tabari Saghir == | == Views on Tabari Saghir == | ||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
# The title “Kabir” has not been recognized by Najashi. | # The title “Kabir” has not been recognized by Najashi. | ||
# About mentioning the name of Tabari, the provided explanations for Najashi is not convincing because the name of Tabari has been associated with another person. So mentioning his name, attributes and works would have been necessary. And if Najashi was careless about it, then Shaykh al-Tusi must have mentioned it. Even if Shaykh al-Tusi forgot about it, then Muntajab al-Din Razi must have mentioned it somewhere. | # About mentioning the name of Tabari, the provided explanations for Najashi is not convincing because the name of Tabari has been associated with another person. So mentioning his name, attributes and works would have been necessary. And if Najashi was careless about it, then Shaykh al-Tusi must have mentioned it. Even if Shaykh al-Tusi forgot about it, then Muntajab al-Din Razi must have mentioned it somewhere. | ||
# Until the 7th century AH, none of Shia [[hadith]] scholars and authors note such a person. Only in [[664]]/ 1265-1266, [[Sayyid b. Tawus]] has mentioned some of the hadiths of Dala’il al-Imama in his works for the first time. | # Until the 7th century AH, none of Shia [[hadith]] scholars and authors note such a person. Only in [[664]]/ 1265-1266, [[Sayyid b. Tawus]] has mentioned some of the hadiths of Dala’il al-Imama in his works for the first time. | ||
Again after Sayyid b. Tawus, for centuries there has been no mention of Dala’il al-Imama until [[Sayyid Hashim Tubali Bahrani]] (d. [[1107]]/1695-1696) has brought its name back to focus and has included some parts of Dala’il al-Imama in his Madinat al-Ma’ajiz. | Again after Sayyid b. Tawus, for centuries there has been no mention of Dala’il al-Imama until [[Sayyid Hashim Tubali Bahrani]] (d. [[1107]]/1695-1696) has brought its name back to focus and has included some parts of Dala’il al-Imama in his Madinat al-Ma’ajiz. | ||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
* [[Dala’il al-Imama]] | * [[Dala’il al-Imama]] | ||
* [[Nawadir al-Mu’jizat fi manaqib al-a’immat al-hudat]] | * [[Nawadir al-Mu’jizat fi manaqib al-a’immat al-hudat]] | ||
Haji Nuri and Aqa Buzurg Tehrani have attributed the latter to the author of Dala’il al-Imama. However, some people have argued that the book is more recent than Dala’il al-Imama. They claim that both books have not been written by the same author. | Haji Nuri and Aqa Buzurg Tehrani have attributed the latter to the author of Dala’il al-Imama. However, some people have argued that the book is more recent than Dala’il al-Imama. They claim that both books have not been written by the same author. | ||
== Life of Tabari the Third == | == Life of Tabari the Third == | ||