Anonymous user
Battle of Banu Qurayza: Difference between revisions
m
no edit summary
imported>Bahrami |
imported>Bahrami mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
* Dr. Shahidi says: "It looks like that the story of the [[Battle of Banu Qurayza]], is altered and written years after the event, by a story teller from [[Khazraj]] tribe, whose intention was to imply that the Prophet (s) killed Banu Qurayza, the ally of [[Aws]], contrary to the ally of Khazraj (Banu Nadir) who hadn't been killed; because Khazraj was dearer to the Prophet (s) than Aws"<ref>Shahidi, ''Tarikh-i tahlili-i Islam'', P.90</ref>. | * Dr. Shahidi says: "It looks like that the story of the [[Battle of Banu Qurayza]], is altered and written years after the event, by a story teller from [[Khazraj]] tribe, whose intention was to imply that the Prophet (s) killed Banu Qurayza, the ally of [[Aws]], contrary to the ally of Khazraj (Banu Nadir) who hadn't been killed; because Khazraj was dearer to the Prophet (s) than Aws"<ref>Shahidi, ''Tarikh-i tahlili-i Islam'', P.90</ref>. | ||
* [[Malik b. Anas]] had named the main narrator of the story, Ibn Ishaq, as [[Dajjal]]<ref>Ibn Hajar, ''Tahdhib'', Vol.9, P.36</ref>! Because he had narrated the story of the battles of Muslims with the Jews, from Jews, who have a history of faking stories<ref>Ibn Hajar, ''Tahdhib'', Vol.9, PP.39-40</ref>. | * [[Malik b. Anas]] had named the main narrator of the story, Ibn Ishaq, as [[Dajjal]]<ref>Ibn Hajar, ''Tahdhib'', Vol.9, P.36</ref>! Because he had narrated the story of the battles of Muslims with the Jews, from Jews, who have a history of faking stories<ref>Ibn Hajar, ''Tahdhib'', Vol.9, PP.39-40</ref>. | ||
* [[Ibn Hajar al-'Asqalani]] had also considered the reason of weakness of narrations of Ibn Ishaq as narrating such a stories from such a | * [[Ibn Hajar al-'Asqalani]] had also considered the reason of weakness of narrations of Ibn Ishaq as narrating such a stories from such a sources<ref>Ibn Hajar, ''Tahdhib'', Vol.9, PP.39-40</ref>. | ||
* Sayyid Ahmad Barakat had also rejected the story of Ibn Ishaq with various reasons<ref> Barakat Ahmad, ''Muhammad and the Jews: A Re-examination'', p. 24</ref>. | * Sayyid Ahmad Barakat had also rejected the story of Ibn Ishaq with various reasons<ref> Barakat Ahmad, ''Muhammad and the Jews: A Re-examination'', p. 24</ref>. | ||
* Walid ‘Arafat also considered the story of Ibn Ishaq far from the real story of Banu Qurayza, the main reason is that Ibn Ishaq doesn’t have any correct document, and also some other reasons are mentioned<ref>W. N. Arafat, ''New Light on the Story of Banu Qurayza and the Jews of Medina'', Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland (1976), pp. 100-107</ref>. | * Walid ‘Arafat also considered the story of Ibn Ishaq far from the real story of Banu Qurayza, the main reason is that Ibn Ishaq doesn’t have any correct document, and also some other reasons are mentioned<ref>W. N. Arafat, ''New Light on the Story of Banu Qurayza and the Jews of Medina'', Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain and Ireland (1976), pp. 100-107</ref>. | ||