Al-Burhan fi tafsir al-Qur'an (book): Difference between revisions

Al-Burhan fi tafsir al-Qur'an (book) (view source)

Revision as of 16:39, 31 January 2015

95 bytes added , 31 January 2015

m

no edit summary

VisualWikitext

Anonymous user

imported>Vahid

@@ Line 77: / Line 77: @@
 == Criticisms ==
-Al-Shaykh Mahdi al-Asifi writes:
-“Despite his ample efforts in al-Burhan exegesis, there are some unauthentic and distorted hadiths which convey ideas of exaggeration (al-Ghuluw). It is more likely that the author didn't mean to refine unauthentic hadiths or he meant but it wasn't enough. He has used the sources that are accused for being distorted and has narrated some hadiths that have unreliable chain of transmitters and incoherent content. So, it can be concluded that al-Burhan is a beneficial scholarly effort for researchers who are familiar with the texts and are knowledgeable about reliable and coherent hadiths and are able to differentiate between authentic and unauthentic hadiths. The fact that this book contains some unauthentic hadiths doesn't mean that it is a worthless book but it is like Bihar al-anwar by al-'Allama al-Majlisi which has some unauthentic hadiths, but given this quality, it is a great work that is a huge help to Shiite library. However, gathering the hadiths is the first step and after that, the second step begins which is refinement the hadiths and differentiating the authentic and unauthentic narrations.  The third step is to extract general rules and fundamentals of the interpretational approach of Ahl al-Bayt (a). Without completing all the three steps, it is not possible to benefit from the interpretational hadiths of Ahl al-Bayt (a).”
-Ayatollah Ma'rifat in his al-Tafsir wa al-mufassirun states:
+[[Al-Shaykh Mahdi al-Asifi]] writes:
-“Al-Sayyid Hashim al-Bahrani is one of the accomplished traditionalists who gathered hadiths. He didn't present any idea about the acceptance, rejection or compromise of the hadiths that are against reason or other narrations. ”
-Sayyid Muhammad 'Ali Ayazi:
+“Despite his ample efforts in al-Burhan exegesis, there are some unauthentic and distorted hadiths which convey ideas of exaggeration ([[al-Ghuluw]]). It is more likely that the author didn't mean to refine [[unauthentic hadith]]s or he meant but it wasn't enough. He has used the sources that are accused for being distorted and has narrated some [[hadith]]s that have unreliable chain of transmitters and incoherent content. So, it can be concluded that al-Burhan is a beneficial scholarly effort for researchers who are familiar with the texts and are knowledgeable about reliable and coherent hadiths and are able to differentiate between authentic and unauthentic hadiths. The fact that this book contains some unauthentic hadiths doesn't mean that it is a worthless book but it is like ''[[Bihar al-anwar]]'' by [[al-'Allama al-Majlisi]] which has some unauthentic hadiths, but given this quality, it is a great work that is a huge help to Shiite library. However, gathering the hadiths is the first step and after that, the second step begins which is refinement the hadiths and differentiating the authentic and unauthentic narrations.  The third step is to extract general rules and fundamentals of the interpretational approach of [[Ahl al-Bayt (a)]]. Without completing all the three steps, it is not possible to benefit from the interpretational hadiths of Ahl al-Bayt (a).”
-“The author is one of the Akhbaris who believes that interpreting Qur'an is permissible only through the hadiths of Ahl al-Bayt (a) and interpretation through reasoning, ijtihad and spiritual taste is forbidden.”
+[[Ayatollah]] [[Muhammad Hadi Ma'rifat|Ma'rifat]] in his ''[[al-Tafsir wa al-mufassirun]]'' states:
+“[[Al-Sayyid Hashim al-Bahrani]] is one of the accomplished traditionalists who gathered hadiths. He didn't present any idea about the acceptance, rejection or compromise of the hadiths that are against reason or other narrations. ”
+[[Sayyid Muhammad 'Ali Ayazi]]:
+“The author is one of the [[Akhbari]]s who believes that interpreting [[Qur'an]] is permissible only through the hadiths of Ahl al-Bayt (a) and interpretation through reasoning, [[ijtihad]] and spiritual taste is forbidden.”
 == Versions ==