Anonymous user
Incident of Saqifa: Difference between revisions
→Ansar's and Muhajirun's arguments
imported>Shakeri No edit summary |
imported>Shakeri |
||
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
The argument made by people of [[Quraysh]] for the claim that they were qualified for the succession of the Prophet (s) was that the Prophet (s) was from the Quraysh, and thus they were branches of the same tree that the Prophet (s) belonged to. | The argument made by people of [[Quraysh]] for the claim that they were qualified for the succession of the Prophet (s) was that the Prophet (s) was from the Quraysh, and thus they were branches of the same tree that the Prophet (s) belonged to. | ||
In his exposition of the 65th sermon of [[Nahj al-balagha]], [[Ibn Abi l-Hadid]] says: 'Umar told Ansar: "Arabs will never be happy with your rule, since the Prophet (s) is not from your tribe, but they will definitely accept the rule of a person from the Prophet (s)'s tribe. Who can oppose us, the relatives of the Prophet (s), in his succession and the heritage?" | In his exposition of the 65th sermon of ''[[Nahj al-balagha]]'', [[Ibn Abi l-Hadid]] says: 'Umar told Ansar: "Arabs will never be happy with your rule, since the Prophet (s) is not from your tribe, but they will definitely accept the rule of a person from the Prophet (s)'s tribe. Who can oppose us, the relatives of the Prophet (s), in his succession and the heritage?" | ||
==Reasons for Abu Bakr's victory in Saqifa== | ==Reasons for Abu Bakr's victory in Saqifa== | ||