Anonymous user
People of Consensus: Difference between revisions
m
no edit summary
imported>E.amini m (→References) |
imported>Mohammad.Kh mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
For [[al-Shaykh al-Baha'i]], People of Consensus were very important: if a [[hadith]] was cited in a book attributed to one of these people, he considered it as reliable. [[Mir Damad]] also considered hadiths involving these people to be reliable. On the basis of his understanding of [[al-Kashshi]]'s words, he believed that hadiths involving these people are reliable, even if they drop part of the narrators between them and the Imams (a). | For [[al-Shaykh al-Baha'i]], People of Consensus were very important: if a [[hadith]] was cited in a book attributed to one of these people, he considered it as reliable. [[Mir Damad]] also considered hadiths involving these people to be reliable. On the basis of his understanding of [[al-Kashshi]]'s words, he believed that hadiths involving these people are reliable, even if they drop part of the narrators between them and the Imams (a). | ||
[[Akhbari]] scholars, such as [[Muhammad Amin | [[Akhbari]] scholars, such as [[Muhammad Amin Istarabadi]], [[Fayd Kashani]], [[Husayn b. Shahab al-Din al-Karaki]], and [[al-Hurr al-'Amili]], insisted that there is such a consensus over the realibility of hadiths narrated by these people in order to argue that every hadith in the [[Four Books]] (al-Kutub al-Arba'a) and other Shiite hadith collections. In fact, this has led to the issue coming under more attention by later scholars. Among later scholars, [[Sayyid Muhammad Baqir Shafti|Shafti]] wrote an independent essay on this (published in 1314/1896). | ||
==Names== | ==Names== | ||