Anonymous user
Ali Shari'ati: Difference between revisions
m
→Critics and Oppositions: wiki
imported>Rafati m (→Shari'ati and Clergymen: wiki) |
imported>Rafati m (→Critics and Oppositions: wiki) |
||
| Line 146: | Line 146: | ||
'Ali Shari'ati was always criticized and opposed by different religious and political groups. Here are a number of them: | 'Ali Shari'ati was always criticized and opposed by different religious and political groups. Here are a number of them: | ||
[[Morteza Motahhari]]: He thought attitudes and ideas of Shari'ati were against basic religious teachings. Although he believed in fighting based on Islam, he disagreed with prioritizing it as a principle while neglecting other aspects of religion; he sometimes called this attitude of Shari'ati tendency toward Marxism. Motahhari also wrote a critique on Shari'ati's work | * [[Morteza Motahhari]]: He thought attitudes and ideas of Shari'ati were against basic religious teachings. Although he believed in fighting based on Islam, he disagreed with prioritizing it as a principle while neglecting other aspects of religion; he sometimes called this attitude of Shari'ati tendency toward Marxism. Motahhari also wrote a critique on Shari'ati's work, "Husayn warith-i Adam" (''Husayn the Heir of Adam''), he regarded it a work which justified history based on Marxism and a Marxist mourning on [[Imam al-Husayn (a)]]. | ||
Mahdi Bazargan: He had similar attitudes toward Shari'ati as Motahhari. Bazargan believed limiting religion only on [[Fiqh]], ethics and worship is equally betrayal as limiting religion on sword and [[jihad]]. In addition, Sayyid Husayn Nasr a modern traditionalist stated that Shari'ati movement was poisoning the saint atmosphere of tradition and disturbing spiritual peaceful situation of religion. | * Mahdi Bazargan: He had similar attitudes toward Shari'ati as Motahhari. Bazargan believed limiting religion only on [[Fiqh]], ethics and worship is equally betrayal as limiting religion on sword and [[jihad]]. In addition, Sayyid Husayn Nasr a modern traditionalist stated that Shari'ati movement was poisoning the saint atmosphere of tradition and disturbing spiritual peaceful situation of religion. | ||
A number of seminaries in 1960s and 1970s including Dar al-Tabligh Islami affiliated with Ayatullah Shari'atmadari, the journal of the School of Islam, Ayatullah [[Makarem Shirazi]] and Misbah Yazdi all criticized Shari'ati's attitudes and theories. Different [[exegeses]] of Shari'ati's ideas and theories on historical events and especially Quranic verses were the roots of such criticisms as they found Shari'ati's ideas against original religious narrations including Shari'ati's exegesis on the story of creation of [[Adam]] and [[Eve]]. | A number of seminaries in 1960s and 1970s including Dar al-Tabligh Islami affiliated with Ayatullah Shari'atmadari, the journal of the School of Islam, Ayatullah [[Makarem Shirazi]] and Misbah Yazdi all criticized Shari'ati's attitudes and theories. Different [[exegeses]] of Shari'ati's ideas and theories on historical events and especially Quranic verses were the roots of such criticisms as they found Shari'ati's ideas against original religious narrations including Shari'ati's exegesis on the story of creation of [[Adam]] and [[Eve]]. | ||