Ali Shari'ati: Difference between revisions

A number of seminaries in 1960s and 1970s including Dar al-Tabligh Islami affiliated with Ayatullah Shari'atmadari, the journal of the School of Islam, Ayatullah [[Makarem Shirazi]] and Misbah Yazdi all criticized Shari'ati's attitudes and theories. Different [[exegeses]] of Shari'ati's ideas and theories on historical events and especially Quranic verses were the roots of such criticisms as they found Shari'ati's ideas against original religious narrations including Shari'ati's exegesis on the story of creation of [[Adam]] and [[Eve]].

'Ali Abu al-Hasani was a contemporary historian who wrote a book in 1982 in which he stated the goal of Shari'ati was interpreting outer aspect of being religious to inner aspect of atheism and materialism. He also emphasized on a number of documents written by [[Morteza Motahhari]] who called Shari'ati a dependent/ intellectual planning to deviate religion and promote atheism under the name of religion.

A number of traditionalist clergymen and religious non-combatant groups were among the firsts who criticized Shari'ati. They believed he was not a Shi'ite man and he planned to destroy Shi'ism. These groups also labeled him a person who opposed [[Wilaya]]. They called Husayniyya of Irshad where Shari'ati gave speeches, a place of misleading.

Sayyid Hamid Rowhani a contemporary historian after the Islamic Revolution of Iran, he used letters, documents and reports of SAVAK to prove that Shari'ati was supporting this organization. His ideas were analyzed and responded abundantly.