Jump to content

Narjis (a): Difference between revisions

2 bytes removed ,  20 November 2022
imported>Pourghorbani
imported>Pourghorbani
Line 44: Line 44:


==Criticism of this Hadith==
==Criticism of this Hadith==
Authenticity of this narration have been questioned from several aspects. The most dubious point is the last part. First, there was no major conflict between [[Abbasid]] and Romans after [[242]]/856-857 and there is no report in the sources that the Roman Emperor asked Abbasid to free her grand-daughter.
Authenticity of this narration have been questioned from several aspects. The most dubious point is the last part. First, there was no major conflict between [[Abbasid]] and Romans after [[242]]/856-7 and there is no report in the sources that the Roman Emperor asked Abbasid to free her grand-daughter.


Second, early authors such as [['Ali b. Ibrahim al-Qummi|al-Qummi]], [[Hasan b. Musa al-Nawbakhti|Nawbakhti]], [[al-Kulayni]] and [['Ali b. Husayn al-Mas'udi|al-Mas'udi]] who were contemporaries of [[Muhammad b. Bahr al-Shaybani|al-Shaybani]] - the narrator of the hadith - did not mention this hadith in their works. Also, [[al-Kashshi]], who was acquainted with al-Shaybani, asserts that he was from [[Ghulat]].
Second, early authors such as [['Ali b. Ibrahim al-Qummi|al-Qummi]], [[Hasan b. Musa al-Nawbakhti|Nawbakhti]], [[al-Kulayni]] and [['Ali b. Husayn al-Mas'udi|al-Mas'udi]] who were contemporaries of [[Muhammad b. Bahr al-Shaybani|al-Shaybani]] - the narrator of the hadith - did not mention this hadith in their works. Also, [[al-Kashshi]], who was acquainted with al-Shaybani, asserts that he was from [[Ghulat]].
Anonymous user