Anonymous user
Al-Ghadir Sermon: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
imported>Shakeri No edit summary |
imported>Shakeri No edit summary |
||
| Line 139: | Line 139: | ||
They also argue that, | They also argue that, | ||
Firstly, in Arabic, the verbal form "Maf'al" is not used for the meaning "Awla".<ref>Jurjani, Sharh al-mwaqif, vol.8 p.361</ref> | Firstly, in Arabic, the verbal form "Maf'al" is not used for the meaning "Awla".<ref>Jurjani, ''Sharh al-mwaqif'', vol.8 p.361</ref> | ||
Secondly, if "Mawla" means "prior in making decision for", then we must be able to use them interchangeably; while for instance in this hadith, instead of the phrase "Man kunt-u mawlah", one cannot put "Man kunt-u awla bi-tasarruf".<ref>Razi, Tafsir al-Razi, vol.29 p.459</ref> | Secondly, if "Mawla" means "prior in making decision for", then we must be able to use them interchangeably; while for instance in this hadith, instead of the phrase "Man kunt-u mawlah", one cannot put "Man kunt-u awla bi-tasarruf".<ref>Razi, ''Tafsir al-Razi'', vol.29 p.459</ref> | ||
In return, Shi'a scholars answered these arguments as follows, | In return, Shi'a scholars answered these arguments as follows, | ||
Firstly, Sunni scholars themselves have admitted that "Mawla" has also been used as "awla bi-tasarruf" ["prior in making decision for"].<ref> Taftazani, ''Sharh al-maqasid'', vol.5 p.273</ref> Scholars of literature such as Ghyath Barghuth al-Taghlabi Akhtal (d. 90 AH/709),<ref>Al-Sharif al-Murtada, ''Al-Shafi'', vol.2 p.270</ref> Abu l-Sha'tha' b. Ru'ba al-Sa'di 'Ajaj (d. 90 AH/709),<ref>Al-Sharif al-Murtada, ''Al-Shafi'', vol.2 p.270</ref> Abu Zakariyya Yahya b. Ziyad Fira' (d. 207 AH/822),<ref>Razi, Tafsir al-Razi, vol.29 p.227</ref>Abu 'Ubayda (d. 209 AH/824), Akhfash (d. 215 AH/830) and Zujaj (d. 311 AH/923)<ref>Razi, Tafsir al-Razi, vol.29 p.227</ref> have confirmed this issue. | Firstly, Sunni scholars themselves have admitted that "Mawla" has also been used as "awla bi-tasarruf" ["prior in making decision for"].<ref> Taftazani, ''Sharh al-maqasid'', vol.5 p.273</ref> Scholars of literature such as Ghyath Barghuth al-Taghlabi Akhtal (d. 90 AH/709),<ref>Al-Sharif al-Murtada, ''Al-Shafi'', vol.2 p.270</ref> Abu l-Sha'tha' b. Ru'ba al-Sa'di 'Ajaj (d. 90 AH/709),<ref>Al-Sharif al-Murtada, ''Al-Shafi'', vol.2 p.270</ref> Abu Zakariyya Yahya b. Ziyad Fira' (d. 207 AH/822),<ref>Razi, ''Tafsir al-Razi'', vol.29 p.227</ref>Abu 'Ubayda (d. 209 AH/824), Akhfash (d. 215 AH/830) and Zujaj (d. 311 AH/923)<ref>Razi, ''Tafsir al-Razi'', vol.29 p.227</ref> have confirmed this issue. | ||
Secondly, the second problem mentioned above is not true because if a word is not used in the place of another, it does not mean that they does not have the same meaning; e. g. according to this justification, the word "Nasir" [assistant] which Sunni believe as one of the meanings of the word "Mawla" must be able to be used with the word "Mawla" interchangeably, but "Mawla" cannot be used in the place of "Nasir" so the two words do not have the same meaning. | Secondly, the second problem mentioned above is not true because if a word is not used in the place of another, it does not mean that they does not have the same meaning; e. g. according to this justification, the word "Nasir" [assistant] which Sunni believe as one of the meanings of the word "Mawla" must be able to be used with the word "Mawla" interchangeably, but "Mawla" cannot be used in the place of "Nasir" so the two words do not have the same meaning. | ||
Thirdly, using two synonyms interchangeably is correct if they fit in the context, whereas here they cannot be used interchangeably since "Nasir" is used with the article "Man", but "Mawla" is not.<ref>Amini, Al-Ghadir, vol.1 p.624</ref> | Thirdly, using two synonyms interchangeably is correct if they fit in the context, whereas here they cannot be used interchangeably since "Nasir" is used with the article "Man", but "Mawla" is not.<ref>Amini, ''Al-Ghadir'', vol.1 p.624</ref> | ||
=== Shi'a Opinion === | === Shi'a Opinion === | ||