Anonymous user
Muhammad b. Jarir al-Tabari al-Saghir: Difference between revisions
Muhammad b. Jarir al-Tabari al-Saghir (view source)
Revision as of 16:21, 4 February 2016
, 4 February 2016full-edit-
imported>S.J.Mosavi mNo edit summary |
imported>S.J.Mosavi m (full-edit-) |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
In history, there are two people among [[Muslims]] to have the name Muhammad b. Jarir Tabari. | In history, there are two people among [[Muslims]] to have the name Muhammad b. Jarir Tabari. | ||
# [[Abu Ja’far Muhammad b. Jarir b. Yazid Tabari]] (d. [[310]]/922-923), a [[Sunni]] Muslim, the author of [[Tafsir]] and Tarikh Tabari, who is also famous for his historical books. | # [[Abu Ja’far Muhammad b. Jarir b. Yazid Tabari]] (d. [[310]]/922-923), a [[Sunni]] Muslim, the author of [[Tafsir]] and Tarikh Tabari, who is also famous for his historical books. | ||
# [[Muhammad b. Jarir b. Rustam|Abu Ja’far Muhammad b. Jarir b. Rustam Tabari]] (d. [[329]]/940-941), a [[Shia]] Muslim, contemporary with [[Shaykh al-Kulayni]], who is the author of [[al-Mustarshid fi al-Imama]]. | # [[Muhammad b. Jarir b. Rustam|Abu Ja’far Muhammad b. Jarir b. Rustam Tabari]] (d. [[329]]/940-941), a [[Shia]] Muslim, contemporary with [[Shaykh al-Kulayni]], who is the author of [[al-Mustarshid fi al-Imama]]. | ||
As a rule, to distinguish between the two, the second Tabari is called as Tabari the Shia. | As a rule, to distinguish between the two, the second Tabari is called as Tabari the Shia. | ||
However, the discussion on the author of [[Dala’il al-Imama]] led to the idea of a third Tabari. For some time, Dala’il al-Imama was thought to be the work of Muhammad b. Jarir b. Rustam Tabari the Shia. But in the book, there are indications that show the work does not belong to Tabari the Shia. Hence, they have suggested that it is the work of a third Tabari. | However, the discussion on the author of [[Dala’il al-Imama]] led to the idea of a third Tabari. For some time, Dala’il al-Imama was thought to be the work of Muhammad b. Jarir b. Rustam Tabari the Shia. But in the book, there are indications that show the work does not belong to Tabari the Shia. Hence, they have suggested that it is the work of a third Tabari. | ||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
# [[‘Abd Allah Mamaqani]] says that [[Shaykh al-Tusi]] in his book on Rijal uses the attribute Kabir [lit. “The great”] when describing Tabari the Shia for by saying, “Muhammad b. Jarir b. Rustam al-Tabari al-Kabir”. Mamaqani believes that Shaykh al-Tusi has hired this particular attribute to separate Tabari the author of [[al-Mustarshid fi al-Imama]] from the third Tabari. | # [[‘Abd Allah Mamaqani]] says that [[Shaykh al-Tusi]] in his book on Rijal uses the attribute Kabir [lit. “The great”] when describing Tabari the Shia for by saying, “Muhammad b. Jarir b. Rustam al-Tabari al-Kabir”. Mamaqani believes that Shaykh al-Tusi has hired this particular attribute to separate Tabari the author of [[al-Mustarshid fi al-Imama]] from the third Tabari. | ||
# [[Sayyid Abu al-Qasim al-Khoei]] has supported the existence of a third Tabari; however, he has referred the readers of [[Mu’jam Rijal]] to al-Dhari’a and [[Tabaqat a’lam al-Shi’a]]. | # [[Sayyid Abu al-Qasim al-Khoei]] has supported the existence of a third Tabari; however, he has referred the readers of [[Mu’jam Rijal]] to al-Dhari’a and [[Tabaqat a’lam al-Shi’a]]. | ||
# [[Aqa Buzurg Tehrani]] mentions the attribute “Kabir” by Shaykh al-Tusi in his introduction to al-Mustarshid fi al-Imama and suggests that there must have been a third Tabari living later than the second one. Later in the 8th volume of [[al-Dhari’a]], when discussing [[Dala’il al-Imama]], Aqa Buzurg opens an in-depth discussion proving the existence of a third Tabari. He then reviews different evidences and also different generations of the chains of transmitters of hadiths. By his sources of hadiths in [[Dala’il al-Imama]] and [[Nawadir al-mu’jizat]] , he concludes that the third Tabari has been contemporary with [[Najashi]] (d. 450/1058-1059) and Shaykh al-Tusi (d. 460/1067-1068). The question which then surfaces is how would Najashi, Tusi and [[Muntajab al-Din Razi]] who were very accurate in listing Shia scholars have failed to mention such a person who has been contemporary with them, has narrated hadiths from many of their hadith sources and even most possibly has been living in Baghdad? Aqa Buzurg answers: “that Shaykh al-Tusi and Najashi have not mentioned such a person in their books would not be a good reason to say that he did not exist. Because, they have not mentioned some other scholars contemporary with them either such as: | # [[Aqa Buzurg Tehrani]] mentions the attribute “Kabir” by Shaykh al-Tusi in his introduction to al-Mustarshid fi al-Imama and suggests that there must have been a third Tabari living later than the second one. Later in the 8th volume of [[al-Dhari’a]], when discussing [[Dala’il al-Imama]], Aqa Buzurg opens an in-depth discussion proving the existence of a third Tabari. He then reviews different evidences and also different generations of the chains of transmitters of hadiths. By his sources of hadiths in [[Dala’il al-Imama]] and [[Nawadir al-mu’jizat]] , he concludes that the third Tabari has been contemporary with [[Najashi]] (d. 450/1058-1059) and Shaykh al-Tusi (d. 460/1067-1068). The question which then surfaces is how would Najashi, Tusi and [[Muntajab al-Din Razi]] who were very accurate in listing Shia scholars have failed to mention such a person who has been contemporary with them, has narrated hadiths from many of their hadith sources and even most possibly has been living in Baghdad? Aqa Buzurg answers: “that Shaykh al-Tusi and Najashi have not mentioned such a person in their books would not be a good reason to say that he did not exist. Because, they have not mentioned some other scholars contemporary with them either such as: | ||
{{col-begin|3}} | {{col-begin|3}} | ||
:* [[Karachaki]] (d. 449/1057-1058) | :* [[Karachaki]] (d. 449/1057-1058) | ||
Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
{{end}} | {{end}} | ||
Also | Also some have attributed Dala’ila al-Imama to Tabari Saghir (the Third). Their proof is that the sources of hadiths in Dala’ila al-Imama are older than Tabari the Second. | ||
== Opponents == | == Opponents == | ||
Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
Again after Sayyid b. Tawus, for centuries there has been no mention of Dala’il al-Imama until [[Sayyid Hashim Tubali Bahrani]] (d. [[1107]]/1695-1696) has brought its name back to focus and has included some parts of Dala’il al-Imama in his Madinat al-Ma’ajiz. | Again after Sayyid b. Tawus, for centuries there has been no mention of Dala’il al-Imama until [[Sayyid Hashim Tubali Bahrani]] (d. [[1107]]/1695-1696) has brought its name back to focus and has included some parts of Dala’il al-Imama in his Madinat al-Ma’ajiz. | ||
== Books Attributed to Tabari | == Books Attributed to Tabari the Third == | ||
Two books have been attributed to him: | Two books have been attributed to him: | ||
* [[Dala’il al-Imama]] | * [[Dala’il al-Imama]] | ||
Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
Haji Nuri and Aqa Buzurg Tehrani have attributed the latter to the author of Dala’il al-Imama. However, some people have argued that the book is more recent than Dala’il al-Imama. They claim that both books have not been written by the same author. | Haji Nuri and Aqa Buzurg Tehrani have attributed the latter to the author of Dala’il al-Imama. However, some people have argued that the book is more recent than Dala’il al-Imama. They claim that both books have not been written by the same author. | ||
== | == Life of Tabari the Third == | ||
Naturally, we would have very limited information about the third Tabari’s life because of the ambiguity surrounding this person’s state of being. But based on references, narrations and the chains of different generation of narrators of [[hadith]] and the reports of the two historical books which are attributed to Tabari the Third, the extent of his ideological or intellectual interests and connections can be roughly estimated. | |||
=== | === Name === | ||
If we accept the famous report and assume the title “Kabir” in Shaykh al- | If we accept the famous report and assume the title “Kabir” in [[Shaykh al-Tusi’]]s work a reason for the existence of the third Tabari and also rely on citations by [[Ibn Tawus]], the name of the author of [[Dala’il al-Imama]] is [[Muhammad b. Jarir b. Rustam]]. But, Rustam is a non-Islamic Iranian name which suggests that either his ancestors had not been Muslims or they had kept their Iranian name after they became Muslim. But, the name of his father has been Jarir which is an Arabic name and is seen frequently among the Arabs living before and after Islam. His [[kunya]] “Abu Ja’far” also suggests that either he has had a son named Ja’far or it is an honorary kunya which has been common among Arabs too. | ||
=== Place of Living === | === Place of Living === | ||
The two attributes “Tabari and Amoli” which have been mentioned for him, suggest that he was originally from [[Tabarestan]] [now Mazandaran province] or the city of [[Amol]]. | |||
About his place of living there is no historical report available | About his place of living, there is no historical report available. But according to the sources in narration, who lived in Baghdad, it could be safe to assume that he must have spent many years of his life in [[Iraq]] especially [[Baghdad]]. | ||
=== Date of Death === | === Date of Death === | ||
There is no | There is no sign of the exact dates of (the third Tabari) birth or death. However, his living can be approximately guessed. Of course, this would only be possible through relying on sources that have narrated about him if Tabari the Third has narrated from them directly in the session of hadith hearing in classes ([[Sama’]]), not that he would be narrating from their books (or on the road). | ||
[[Aqa Buzurg Tehrani]] regards Tabari the Third among the scholars contemporary with [[Shaykh al-Tusi]] (d. 460/1067-1068) and Najashi (d. 450/1058-1059), and thus living about a hundred years after Tabari the second. Researchers on [[Dala’il al-Imama]] have all approved of contemporaries. They further believe that he preceded them in both generation and position. | |||
Therefore, it can be said that Tabari, the Third is among the scholars who has been living since the second half of 4th century AH until the first decades of 5th century AH. | Therefore, it can be said that Tabari, the Third is among the scholars who has been living since the second half of 4th century AH until the first decades of 5th century AH. | ||
=== Hadith Sources === | === Hadith Sources === | ||
Researchers on Dala’il al-Imama have introduced two groups of his hadith sources: | Researchers on [[Dala’il al-Imama]] have introduced two groups of his (the third Tabari) hadith sources: | ||
The first group are those Tabari | *The first group are those Tabari the Third attended their classes and received the [[permission for narrating hadith]] from them so that he could say “Hadathna” [retold us], “Haddathani” [told me] or “Akhbirni” [reported to me]. The number of these sources is 19 people among whom are some great [[Shia]] and [[Sunni]] scholars. | ||
The second group are those from whom Tabari directly or through other narrators have narrated hadiths or | *The second group are those from whom Tabari directly or through other narrators have narrated [[hadiths]] or he has benefitted from their books and thus upon quoting a hadith from them, he says “Rawiya” which suggests that he narrated through someone else. The number of these sources is more than 20 people. | ||
[[fa:محمد بن جریر طبری صغیر]] | [[fa:محمد بن جریر طبری صغیر]] |