Draft:Tajāhur bi-l-fisq
Al-Muājara bi-l-fisq (Arabic: المُجَاهَرَةُ بِالْفِسْق), also known as the Open Profession of Sin, denotes the act of committing a Sin publicly with full awareness of its illicit nature. Regarded as a catalyst for societal corruption, this practice is strictly prohibited in Islam. The classification of an act as "tajahur bi-l-fisq" is contingent upon four conditions: the sin must be definite and manifest; its commission must be intentional and conscious; and there must be public awareness regarding the act's prohibition.
Jurists deem tajahur bi-l-fisq to be haram and have delineated specific rulings applicable to the perpetrator. These include the obligation of forbidding the evil, the permissibility of humiliating the individual and engaging in backbiting against them, the forfeiture of their justice (ʿadāla), and their disqualification from receiving Sharia Funds.
In narrations, tajahur bi-l-fisq is described as a cause of disgrace, a precipitant of punishment, and an impediment to Divine forgiveness. Furthermore, consequences such as the trivialization of religion, the promotion of sin, and the erosion of shame are attributed to it. Within penal jurisprudence, punishments including imprisonment and flogging have been prescribed for those who openly profess sin.
Status and Conceptology
Tajahur bi-l-fisq—also referred to in narrational and ethical sources as "tazahur bi-l-dhanb" (open manifestation of sin) and "tahattuk" (shamelessness)[1]—is defined as the commission of a sin in the view of others with full knowledge of its sinfulness.[2] The open profession of sin is cited as a factor that disrupts social order[3] and is classified as an instance of spreading indecency (ishāʿat al-fāḥisha);[4] as such, it is strictly forbidden in Islamic teachings.[5]
Jurists regard tajahur bi-l-fisq as haram[6] and posit that the applicability of the title "tajahur bi-l-fisq" depends on four conditions:[7] the definitiveness of the sin (fisq);[8] the public and manifest nature of its commission;[9] the intentional and conscious nature of the act;[10] and public awareness of the act's prohibition.[11]
Status
Certain Qur'anic verses, notably Qur'an 6:120 and Qur'an 24:19, are interpreted as articulating the prohibition of tajahur bi-l-fisq, wherein God promises punishment for the perpetrator.[12] Additionally, Imam Ali (a) stated in a narration that abstaining from the open commission of sins is superior to the execution of Sharia punishment upon the sinner.[13]
In jurisprudential sources, this topic is discussed sporadically within the chapters on Jihad and prohibited gains (specifically in the discussion regarding exceptions to backbiting).[14] A stipulation of the covenant of protection (dhimma) for the People of the Book is the avoidance of openly professing sin, such as drinking alcohol or consuming pork. It is established that in cases of open profession of sin, the dhimma contract is invalidated, and the perpetrator becomes subject to Sharia punishment.[15]
Instances
Tajahur bi-l-fisq encompasses numerous instances; prominent examples include openly consuming alcohol, gambling, observing improper hijab, breaking the fast in public, and imitating non-believers.[16] According to some researchers, the dissemination of sinful acts in virtual spaces is jurisprudentially equivalent to their publication in the physical realm and thus constitutes an instance of tajahur bi-l-fisq.[17]
Jurisprudential Consequences for Open Sinners
An individual who openly professes Sin faces several jurisprudential consequences, including:
- Permissibility of backbiting: From the perspective of Sharia, one who openly professes sin forfeits the right to respect.[18] Consequently, according to narrations,[19] backbiting them is permissible.[20]
- The obligation of forbidding the evil toward the open sinner in the presence of others, provided there is a probability of influence.[21]
- The permissibility of severing ties and ceasing interactions with relatives who are open sinners.[22]
- The permissibility of humiliation.[23]
- Disqualification from receiving Sharia Funds, such as Zakat,[24] Khums,[25] and expiation.[26]
- The loss of justice and subsequent ineligibility to hold positions such as Imam of the congregation,[27] judiciary roles, or giving testimony in court.[28]
- Confiscation of the property of one who openly professes oppression, such as a tyrannical ruler; such property may be confiscated for the benefit of the Bayt al-Mal or as retaliation.[29]
Consequences
Religious texts enumerate various consequences of openly professing sin, including the belittling of religion, the trivialization of Sin, and the promotion of shamelessness;[30] exclusion from the Divine presence, the transformation of a minor sin into a major sin, and the propagation of corruption within society.[31]
In the narrations of the Infallibles (a), the public commission of sin is also reckoned among the causes of abasement and disgrace[32] as well as the acceleration of Divine retribution.[33] A hadith from Imam al-Sadiq (a) identifies the person who openly commits fisq as a sinner whose transgressions are excluded from Divine pardon.[34]
Foundations for Punishing the Open Sinner
Pursuant to Article 836 of the Islamic Penal Code of Iran, any individual who publicly commits a sin that offends public decency shall be sentenced to punishment ranging from ten days to two months of imprisonment, or up to 31 lashes.[35] Religious scholars have adduced various theoretical foundations to substantiate these forms of punishment. Some researchers attribute the basis of societal penal regulations to God's will. This group posits that human reason is incapable of designing a comprehensive legal system; consequently, the penal system must be constructed in reliance upon Divine revelation.[36] The prevention of disruption to the social order constitutes another theoretical justification for punishing the open sinner. Husayn 'Ali Montazeri and Morteza Motahhari opine that the enactment of penal laws and regulations preserves society from disturbance and chaos. Furthermore, they argue that the restriction of freedoms resulting from such laws aligns with the conduct of the wise.[37]
Monograph
On the subject of tajahur bi-l-fisq, the book Mawḍūʿ-shināsī-yi Tazāhur wa Tajāhur bi Fisq (Conceptology of Public Sin and Open Profession of Fisq) was authored by Husayn San'at-pur at the Institute for the Conceptology of Jurisprudential Rulings. In this work, the author elucidates the primary criteria for the applicability of tajahur bi-l-fisq. He further identifies common societal sins committed publicly and concludes with a section detailing the jurisprudential rulings pertaining to the open sinner.[38]
Notes
- ↑ Mudarris, Khirad wa Sipāh-i ū, 1372 Sh, vol. 1, p. 177.
- ↑ Ibn Manẓūr, Lisān al-ʿArab, under the root "j-h-r"; Gūharī and Āzādmanish, "Mabānī-yi Fiqhī wa Ḥuqūqī-yi Ḥurmat-i Tazāhur bi Fisq", p. 1347.
- ↑ Gūharī and Āzādmanish, "Mabānī-yi Fiqhī wa Ḥuqūqī-yi Ḥurmat-i Tazāhur bi Fisq", p. 1359.
- ↑ Qarā'atī, Gunāh-shināsī, 1386 Sh, pp. 108, 110.
- ↑ Qarā'atī, Gunāh-shināsī, 1386 Sh, p. 108.
- ↑ Sabzwārī, Muhadhdhab al-Aḥkām, 1413 AH, vol. 15, p. 244; Najafī, Muṣṭafā al-Dīn al-Qayyim, 1427 AH, p. 127.
- ↑ Chūpānī, "Mabānī wa Āthār-i Fiqhī wa Ḥuqūqī-yi Jarāyim-i Mashhūd"; Gūharī and Āzādmanish, "Mabānī-yi Fiqhī wa Ḥuqūqī-yi Ḥurmat-i Tazāhur bi Fisq", p. 1351; Sanʿat-pūr, Mawḍūʿ-shināsī-yi Tazāhur wa Tajāhur bi Fisq, 1399 Sh, p. 3.
- ↑ Īrawānī, Ḥāshiyat al-Makāsib, 1406 AH, vol. 1, p. 35.
- ↑ Arākī, al-Makāsib al-Muḥarrama, 1413 AH, p. 215.
- ↑ Anṣārī, Kitāb al-Makāsib, 1415 AH, vol. 1, p. 346.
- ↑ Īrawānī, Ḥāshiyat al-Makāsib, 1406 AH, vol. 1, p. 35.
- ↑ Gūharī and Āzādmanish, "Mabānī-yi Fiqhī wa Ḥuqūqī-yi Ḥurmat-i Tazāhur bi Fisq", pp. 1351-1352.
- ↑ Ṣadūq, Man lā yaḥḍuruh al-faqīh, 1412 AH, vol. 4, p. 31.
- ↑ Encyclopedia of Islamic Jurisprudence, Farhang-i Fiqh, 1387 Sh, vol. 2, p. 514.
- ↑ Najafī, Jawāhir al-Kalām, 1404 AH, vol. 21, p. 269.
- ↑ Gūharī and Āzādmanish, "Mabānī-yi Fiqhī wa Ḥuqūqī-yi Ḥurmat-i Tazāhur bi Fisq", p. 1355.
- ↑ Kāẓimī Muṭlaq and Mu'minī, "Imkān-sinjī-yi Taḥaqquq-i Tazāhur dar Faḍā-yi Majāzī wa Jilwih-hā-yi Ān", p. 81.
- ↑ Encyclopedia of Islamic Jurisprudence, Farhang-i Fiqh, 1387 Sh, vol. 2, p. 514.
- ↑ Ḥurr ʿĀmilī, Wasā'il al-Shīʿa, 1409 AH, vol. 12, p. 289; Nūrī, Mustadrak al-Wasā'il, 1408 AH, vol. 8, p. 461.
- ↑ Anṣārī, al-Makāsib al-Muḥarrama, 1415 AH, vol. 1, p. 343; Mūsawī Khū'ī, Miṣbāḥ al-Faqāha, 1377 Sh, vol. 1, p. 340.
- ↑ Imām Khumaynī, Taḥrīr al-Wasīla, Dar al-'Ilm, vol. 1, p. 468.
- ↑ Mūsawī Gulpayigānī, Majmaʿ al-Masā'il, 1409 AH, vol. 1, p. 524.
- ↑ Anṣārī, Kitāb al-Makāsib, 1415 AH, vol. 1, p. 346.
- ↑ Ṭabāṭabā'ī Yazdī, al-ʿUrwat al-Wuthqā (al-Muḥashshā), 1419 AH, vol. 4, p. 226.
- ↑ Ṭabāṭabā'ī Yazدī, al-ʿUrwat al-Wuthqā (al-Muḥashshā), 1419 AH, vol. 4, p. 306; Imām Khumaynī, Taḥrīr al-Wasīla, 1425 AH, vol. 1, p. 344.
- ↑ Iṣfahānī, Wasīlat al-Najāt, 1422 AH, p. 593; Imām Khumaynī, Taḥrīr al-Wasīla, 1425 AH, vol. 2, p. 125.
- ↑ Imām Khumaynī, Taḥrīr al-Wasīla, 1425 AH, vol. 1, p. 499.
- ↑ ʿAllāma al-Ḥillī, Taḥrīr al-Aḥkām al-Sharʿiyya, 1420 AH, vol. 5, p. 316; Najafī, Jawāhir al-Kalām, 1404 AH, vol. 41, p. 25.
- ↑ Lārī, Majmūʿ al-Rasā'il, 1357 AH, p. 316; Chūpānī, "Mabānī wa Āthār-i Fiqhī wa Ḥuqūqī-yi Jarāyim-i Mashhūd".
- ↑ Māzandarānī, Sharḥ al-Kāfī, 1382 AH, vol. 10, p. 143; Makārim Shīrāzī, Tafsīr-i Nimūna, 1374 Sh, vol. 14, p. 406.
- ↑ Salmānī and Nūrmuḥammadī, "Barrasī-yi Fiqhī-yi Tazāhur bi Fisq wa Fujūr", p. 227.
- ↑ Kulaynī, al-Kāfī, 1407 AH, vol. 2, p. 428, hadith 1.
- ↑ Tamīmī Āmidī, Ghurar al-Ḥikam, 1410 AH, p. 707, hadith 100.
- ↑ Ḥimyarī, Qurb al-Isnād, 1413 AH, p. 176, hadith 645; Kulaynī, al-Kāfī, 1407 AH, vol. 8, p. 128, hadith 98.
- ↑ Gūharī and Āzādmanish, "Mabānī-yi Fiqhī wa Ḥuqūqī-yi Ḥurmat-i Tazāhur bi Fisq", p. 1357; Salmānī and Nūrmuḥammadī, "Barrasī-yi Fiqhī-yi Tazāhur bi Fisq wa Fujūr", p. 216.
- ↑ Salmānī and Nūrmuḥammadī, "Barrasī-yi Fiqhī-yi Tazāhur bi Fisq wa Fujūr", pp. 220-221.
- ↑ Muntaẓirī, Mabānī-yi Fiqhī-yi Ḥukūmat-i Islāmī, 1408 AH, vol. 8, pp. 309-310; Mutahhari, ʿAdl-i Ilāhī, 1402 Sh, p. 203.
- ↑ Mawḍūʿ-shināsī-yi Tazāhur wa Tajāhur bi Fisq, Website of the Center for the Conceptology of Jurisprudential Rulings.
References
- Ibn Manẓūr, Muḥammad. Lisān al-ʿArab. 3rd ed. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr, 1414 Sh.
- Arākī, Muḥammad ʿAlī. al-Makāsib al-Muḥarrama. 1st ed. Qom: In the Path of Truth Institute, 1413 AH.
- Iṣfahānī, Sayyid Abū al-Ḥasan. Wasīlat al-Najāt. Glosses by Imam Khomeini. 1st ed. Qom: Institute for Regulation and Publication of Imam Khomeini's Works, 1422 AH.
- Imām Khumaynī, Sayyid Rūḥ Allāh. Taḥrīr al-Wasīla. Tehran: Institute for Regulation and Publication of Imam Khomeini's Works, 1425 AH.
- Anṣārī, Murtaḍā. Kitāb al-Makāsib. 1st ed. Qom: World Congress for the Commemoration of Shaykh al-Aʿzam al-Anṣārī, 1415 AH.
- Īrawānī, ʿAlī b. ʿAbd al-Ḥusayn. Ḥāshiyat al-Makāsib. 1st ed. Tehran: Ministry of Culture and Islamic Guidance, 1406 AH.
- Tamīmī Āmidī, ʿAbd al-Wāḥid b. Muḥammad. Ghurar al-Ḥikam wa Durar al-Kalim. Edited by Sayyid Mahdī Rajā'ī. 2nd ed. Qom: Dār al-Kitāb al-Islāmī, 1410 AH.
- Chūpānī, Mahdī. "Mabānī wa Āthār-i Fiqhī wa Ḥuqūqī-yi Jarāyim-i Mashhūd". Pazhūhish-nāmi-yi Ḥuqūq-i Islāmī, no. 30, 1388 Sh.
- Ḥimyarī, ʿAbd Allāh b. Jaʿfar. Qurb al-Isnād. 1st ed. Qom: Mu'assisih-yi Āl al-Bayt (a), 1413 AH.
- Sabzwārī, Sayyid ʿAbd al-Aʿlā. Muhadhdhab al-Aḥkām fī Bayān al-Ḥalāl wa al-Ḥarām. 4th ed. Qom: al-Manār Institute, 1413 AH.
- Salmānī, Īrān and Muḥammad Riḍā Nūrmuḥammadī. "Barrasī-yi Fiqhī-yi Tazāhur bi Fisq wa Fujūr". International Conference on Religious Studies, Islamic Sciences, Jurisprudence and Law in Iran and the World, 1398 Sh.
- Sanʿat-pūr, Ḥusayn. Mawḍūʿ-shināsī-yi Tazāhur wa Tajāhur bi Fisq. 1st ed. Qom: Specialized Center for Mahdism, 1399 Sh.
- Ṭabāṭabā'ī Yazdī, Sayyid Muḥammad Kāẓim. al-ʿUrwat al-Wuthqā (al-Muḥashshā). Compiled by Aḥmad Muḥsinī Sabzwārī. 1st ed. Qom: Islamic Publication Office, 1419 AH.
- ʿAllāma al-Ḥillī, Ḥasan b. Yūsuf. Taḥrīr al-Aḥkām al-Sharʿiyya ʿalā Madhhab al-Imāmiyya. Edited by Ibrāhīm Bahādurī. 1st ed. Qom: Imam Sadiq (a) Institute, 1420 AH.
- Qarā'atī, Muḥsin. Gunāh-shināsī. Compiled by Muḥammad Muḥammadī Ishtihārdī. 8th ed. Tehran: Center for Lessons from the Qur'an, 1386 Sh.
- Kāẓimī Muṭlaq, Ḥamīd, and ʿĀbidīn Mu'minī. "Imkān-sinjī-yi Taḥaqquq-i Tazāhur dar Faḍā-yi Majāzī wa Jilwih-hā-yi Ān". Faḍā-yi Majāzī Legal Journal, vol. 1, no. 3, 1401 Sh.
- Kulaynī, Muḥammad b. Yaʿqūb. al-Kāfī. Edited by ʿAlī Akbar Ghaffārī and Muḥammad Ākhūndī. 4th ed. Tehran: Dār al-Kutub al-Islāmiyya, 1407 AH.
- Gūharī, Dāwūd, and Āzādmanish, Laylā. "Mabānī-yi Fiqhī wa Ḥuqūqī-yi Ḥurmat-i Tazāhur bi Fisq". In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Management and Humanities Research in Iran, University of Tehran, 1397 Sh.
- Lārī, Sayyid ʿAbd al-Ḥusayn. Majmūʿ al-Rasā'il. Hyderabad: Da'irat al-Ma'arif al-Uthmaniyya, 1357 AH.
- Encyclopedia of Islamic Jurisprudence. Farhang-i Fiqh Muṭābiq bā Madhhab-i Ahl-i Bayt (a). Qom: Encyclopedia of Islamic Jurisprudence Institute, 1387 Sh.
- Mudarris, Muḥammad Bāqir. Khirad wa Sipāh-i ū. Tehran: Kulaynī Press, 1372 Sh.
- Mutahhari, Morteza. ʿAdl-i Ilāhī. Tehran: Sadra, 1402 Sh.
- Makārim Shīrāzī, Nāṣir. Tafsīr-i Nimūna. 1st ed. Tehran: Dār al-Kutub al-Islāmiyya, 1374 Sh.
- Muntaẓirī, Ḥusayn-ʿalī. Mabānī-yi Fiqhī-yi Ḥukūmat-i Islāmī. Translated by Maḥmūd Ṣalawātī and Abū l-Faḍl Shukūrī. Tehran: Kayhān Press, 1408 AH.
- Mūsawī Khū'ī, Sayyid Abū al-Qāsim. Miṣbāḥ al-Faqāha (al-Makāsib). Reported by Muḥammad ʿAlī Tawḥīdī. Qom: Dawari, 1377 Sh.
- Mūsawī Gulpayigānī, Sayyid Muḥammad Riḍā. Majmaʿ al-Masā'il. Edited by ʿAlī Karīmī Jahrumī, ʿAlī Thābitī Hamadānī, and ʿAlī Nayyirī Hamadānī. 2nd ed. Qom: Dār al-Qur'an al-Karīm, 1409 AH.