Physician's Liability
This section is a general introduction to the rulings of a fiqhi topic. |
Physician's Liability (Arabic: ضمان الطبیب, ḍamān al-ṭabīb) refers to the legal responsibility of a physician toward a patient during the process of medical treatment. This issue is discussed in Medical Jurisprudence and law. Muslim jurists agree that if a person claims to be a physician and engages in treatment without having medical knowledge, he is liable (ḍāmin) if the treatment results in death or injury.
According to Shi'a jurists, if a physician is negligent during treatment and practice and does not have permission from the patient or his guardian, he is liable, even if he is skilled.
However, there is a disagreement among jurists regarding the liability of a physician who possesses the necessary skills for treatment, exerts all efforts and caution, has permission from the patient or his guardian, and commits no negligence, yet the treatment leads to death or defect of a limb.
The well-known opinion among Shi'a jurists is that the physician is liable. Some, such as Ibn Idris al-Hilli, hold the view that the physician is not liable in this case.
Concept and Status
Physician's liability encompasses all financial obligations and compensations that become incumbent upon the physician, whether intentionally or unintentionally.[1] The term "liability" (ḍamān) is a widely used term in jurisprudence and law, defined as the responsibility for something, which entails compensation (tadāruk) in the event of damage or loss.[2] In law, this term is sometimes used synonymously with "responsibility".[3]
Narrations regarding physician's liability have been transmitted from the Imams (a).[4] Al-Hurr al-'Amili has dedicated a chapter in Wasa'il al-Shi'a to "The Liability of the Physician and Veterinarian" (Ḍamān al-Ṭabīb wa l-Bayṭār), collecting several narrations under it.[5] Thus, this issue has been discussed by Shi'a jurists from early times under the issue of liability or the Rule of Liability.[6] Furthermore, physician's liability is discussed as an independent issue in Medical Jurisprudence under New Jurisprudential Issues.[7]
Types of Liability
In Islamic jurisprudence, liability is classified into the following types:
- Contractual Liability (Ḍamān al-ʿAqdī): A contract by which a person undertakes a financial obligation that is upon another person.[8] Contractual liability is formed through Offer and Acceptance, accompanied by knowledge, intention, and the free will and consent of the guarantor and the other parties.[9] This type of liability is typically discussed in a separate chapter in jurisprudence.[10]
- Coercive Liability (Ḍamān al-Qahrī): The responsibility to perform an act or compensate for a loss that occurs without any contract, established automatically (coercively) between individuals.[11] This type of liability is involuntary; the guarantor does not intend to obligate himself, but the law imposes this responsibility upon him.[12] It is said that the issue of physician's liability is mostly discussed under this category.[13]
Significance
According to a narration from Imam al-Sadiq (a), the people of every land are in need of three things for their worldly and otherworldly affairs, without which they would live a miserable life; one of these is "a knowledgeable and trustworthy physician."[14]
However, mistakes sometimes occur in treatment and medical practice, which may result in the patient's death, loss of a faculty, or physical and financial damages.[15] Therefore, jurists, relying on religious evidence, and legislators have deduced rulings and criteria to preserve patients' rights and compensate for damages resulting from medical negligence or error, thereby defining the civil and criminal liability of physicians.[16]
Types of Physician's Liability
Regarding the physician's responsibility, several scenarios are conceivable: the physician is either knowledgeable or ignorant of medical matters; either negligent or non-negligent; and either authorized or unauthorized.[17] The presence or absence of each of these states affects the physician's liability.[18]
Liability of an Ignorant Physician
Muslim jurists agree that if someone introduces himself as a physician and engages in treatment without knowledge of medical matters, he is liable if he causes death or injury.[19] They cite a narration from Prophet Muhammad (s) stating that anyone who practices medicine without prior learning is liable.[20]
Some also cite a narration from Imam Ali (a), stating that it is incumbent upon the ruler to imprison ignorant physicians.[21]
Liability of a Negligent Physician
According to Shi'a jurists, if a physician is negligent during treatment and practice and does not have permission from the patient or his guardian, he is liable, even if he is skilled.[22] Consensus (ijma'), the Rule of Liability (Qāʿidat al-Ḍamān), and the principle of the inviolability of a Muslim's blood (ʿadam buṭlān dam al-Muslim) are cited as evidence for this ruling.[23]
Liability of an Authorized Physician
There is a disagreement among jurists regarding the liability of a physician who possesses the necessary skills for treatment, exerts all efforts and caution, has permission from the patient or his guardian, and commits no negligence, yet the treatment leads to death or defect of a limb.[24]
The famous opinion among Shi'a jurists is that the physician is liable even in these conditions.[25] The following arguments are cited for this view:
- Rule of Destruction (Itlāf): Since the death or defect is attributed to the physician's action, he is liable.[26]
- Rule of No Harm (Lā Ḍarar): Damages caused by the physician during treatment are conventionally considered instances of harm; thus, based on the Rule of No Harm, the physician is liable.[27]
- Inviolability of Muslim Blood: Since the death or defect is attributed to the physician's act, and based on the rule that a Muslim's blood cannot be shed in vain, the physician is liable.[28]
- Narration of Sakuni: A narration from Imam al-Sadiq (a) stating that Imam Ali (a) held a circumciser liable for cutting the prepuce more than necessary.[29]
- Consensus.[30] Some, like al-Shahid al-Thani, consider the narration of Sakuni weak and prioritize the consensus.[31]
Non-Liability of an Authorized Physician
Some jurists, such as Ibn Idris al-Hilli and al-Muqaddas al-Ardabili, hold that if the physician is skilled, has permission from the patient or his guardian, and is not negligent in treatment, he is not liable.[32] They rely on the following arguments:
- Principle of Exemption (Aṣl al-Barāʾa): Where the physician has the necessary skills and applies them, in case of doubt regarding liability for death or defect, the principle is the exemption of his liability (dhimma).[33]
- Since the skilled physician is authorized by the patient or his guardian for the treatment process, he is not liable for death or defect.[34]
- Narrations indicating that a physician skilled in medical matters is not liable for death or injury occurring during treatment.[35]
- Rule of Benevolence (Iḥsān): This rule is considered to negate liability.[36] According to this rule, since the physician acts out of benevolence to remove harm from the patient, he is not liable for death or damages.[37]
Notes
- ↑ Fāḍil Lankaranī, Aḥkām-i pizishkān wa bīmārān, 1427 AH, p. 187.
- ↑ Nāʾīnī, Munyat al-ṭālib, 1373 AH, vol. 1, p. 118; Khudābakhshī, "Bāzshināsī-yi mafhūmī-yi ḍamān wa aqsām-i ān dar fiqh-i Islāmī", pp. 18-19.
- ↑ Khudābakhshī, "Bāzshināsī-yi mafhūmī-yi ḍamān wa aqsām-i ān dar fiqh-i Islāmī", pp. 10, 21.
- ↑ Ḥurr al-ʿĀmilī, Wasāʾil al-Shīʿa, vol. 29, p. 260.
- ↑ Ḥurr al-ʿĀmilī, Wasāʾil al-Shīʿa, vol. 29, p. 260.
- ↑ See for example: Najafī, Jawāhir al-kalām, 1362 Sh, vol. 43, p. 44.
- ↑ See for example: Qāsimī, Dānishnāma-yi fiqh-i pizishkī, 1395 Sh, vol. 1, p. 80.
- ↑ Shahīd al-Thānī, Al-Rawḍa al-bahiyya, 1410 AH, vol. 4, p. 113; ʿAmīd Zanjānī, Mūjibāt-i ḍamān, 1382 Sh, p. 199.
- ↑ ʿAmīd Zanjānī, Mūjibāt-i ḍamān, 1382 Sh, p. 195.
- ↑ Shahīd al-Thānī, Al-Rawḍa al-bahiyya, 1410 AH, vol. 4, p. 113; Hāshimī Shāhrūdī, Farhang-i fiqh, 1387 Sh, vol. 5, p. 152.
- ↑ Qāsimī, Dānishnāma-yi fiqh-i pizishkī, 1395 Sh, vol. 1, pp. 80-81.
- ↑ Qāsimī, Dānishnāma-yi fiqh-i pizishkī, 1395 Sh, vol. 1, pp. 80-81.
- ↑ Qāsimī, Dānishnāma-yi fiqh-i pizishkī, 1395 Sh, vol. 1, p. 80.
- ↑ Majlisī, Biḥār al-anwār, vol. 75, p. 235.
- ↑ Mūsawī Bujnūrdī, "Masʾūliyyat-i madanī wa kayfarī-yi pizishk bā takiyya bar ārā-yi Imām Khumaynī", p. 29.
- ↑ Mūsawī Bujnūrdī, "Masʾūliyyat-i madanī wa kayfarī-yi pizishk bā takiyya bar ārā-yi Imām Khumaynī", p. 30.
- ↑ Ḥusayn-Pūr, "Ḍamān-i pizishk az manẓar-i fiqh-i Imāmiyya", p. 101.
- ↑ Ḥusayn-Pūr, "Ḍamān-i pizishk az manẓar-i fiqh-i Imāmiyya", p. 101.
- ↑ Ḥusayn-Pūr, "Ḍamān-i pizishk az manẓar-i fiqh-i Imāmiyya", pp. 101-102.
- ↑ Shawkānī, Nayl al-awṭār, 1414 AH, vol. 6, pp. 35-36.
- ↑ Ismāʿīl-Ābādī, "Ngāhī taṭbīqī bi ḍamān-i ṭabīb dar madhāhib-i Islāmī", p. 148; Ḥurr al-ʿĀmilī, Wasāʾil al-Shīʿa, 1416 AH, vol. 27, p. 301.
- ↑ Ṭabāṭabāʾī, Riyāḍ al-masāʾil, 1412 AH, vol. 14, pp. 197-198; Najafī, Jawāhir al-kalām, 1362 Sh, vol. 43, pp. 44-45.
- ↑ Ṭabāṭabāʾī, Riyāḍ al-masāʾil, 1412 AH, vol. 14, pp. 197-198; Najafī, Jawāhir al-kalām, 1362 Sh, vol. 43, pp. 44-45.
- ↑ Najafī, Jawāhir al-kalām, 1362 Sh, vol. 43, p. 45; Ḥusayn-Pūr, "Ḍamān-i pizishk az manẓar-i fiqh-i Imāmiyya", pp. 103-104.
- ↑ Shahīd al-Thānī, Masālik al-afhām, 1423 AH, vol. 15, p. 327; Najafī, Jawāhir al-kalām, 1362 Sh, vol. 43, p. 46.
- ↑ Muqaddas al-Ardabīlī, Majmaʿ al-fāʾida wa l-burhān, vol. 14, p. 227; Najafī, Jawāhir al-kalām, 1362 Sh, vol. 43, p. 45.
- ↑ Mūsawī Bujnūrdī, "Masʾūliyyat-i madanī wa kayfarī-yi pizishk bā takiyya bar ārā-yi Imām Khumaynī", p. 50; Ḥusayn-Pūr, "Ḍamān-i pizishk az manẓar-i fiqh-i Imāmiyya", p. 108.
- ↑ Shahīd al-Thānī, Al-Rawḍa al-bahiyya, 1410 AH, vol. 10, p. 108; Muqaddas al-Ardabīlī, Majmaʿ al-fāʾida wa l-burhān, vol. 14, p. 227.
- ↑ Shahīd al-Thānī, Masālik al-afhām, 1423 AH, vol. 15, p. 327; Najafī, Jawāhir al-kalām, 1362 Sh, vol. 43, p. 46; Ḥurr al-ʿĀmilī, Wasāʾil al-Shīʿa, 1416 AH, vol. 29, p. 260.
- ↑ Shahīd al-Thānī, Masālik al-afhām, 1423 AH, vol. 15, pp. 327-328; Najafī, Jawāhir al-kalām, 1362 Sh, vol. 43, p. 46.
- ↑ Shahīd al-Thānī, Al-Rawḍa al-bahiyya, 1410 AH, vol. 10, p. 110.
- ↑ Ibn Idrīs, Al-Sarāʾir, 1410 AH, vol. 3, p. 373; Muqaddas al-Ardabīlī, Majmaʿ al-fāʾida wa l-burhān, vol. 14, p. 229.
- ↑ Ibn Idrīs, Al-Sarāʾir, 1410 AH, vol. 3, p. 373.
- ↑ Ibn Idrīs, Al-Sarāʾir, 1410 AH, vol. 3, p. 373.
- ↑ Kulaynī, Al-Kāfī, 1407 AH, vol. 8, pp. 193-194; Ḥusayn-Pūr, "Ḍamān-i pizishk az manẓar-i fiqh-i Imāmiyya", p. 112.
- ↑ ʿAlīzāda, "Taʾthīr-i qāʿida-yi iḥsān bar masʾūliyyat-i pizishk", p. 519.
- ↑ Ḥusayn-Pūr, "Ḍamān-i pizishk az manẓar-i fiqh-i Imāmiyya", p. 113; ʿAlīzāda, "Taʾthīr-i qāʿida-yi iḥsān bar masʾūliyyat-i pizishk", p. 519.
References
- ʿAlīzāda, Fāṭima, et al. "Taʾthīr-i qāʿida-yi iḥsān bar masʾūliyyat-i pizishk; mawrid-pazhūhī-yi taṭbīqī: ḥuqūq-i Īrān wa Āmrīkā". Pazhūhish-hā-yi ḥuqūqī. Vol. 23, No. 57, Spring 1403 Sh.
- ʿAmīd Zanjānī, ʿAbbās ʿAlī. Mūjibāt-i ḍamān: Darāmadī bar masʾūliyyat-i madanī, asbāb wa āthār-i ān dar fiqh. Tehran, Nashr-i Mīzān, 1382 Sh.
- Fāḍil Lankaranī, Muḥammad. Aḥkām-i pizishkān wa bīmārān. Qom, Markaz-i Fiqhī-yi Aʾimma-yi Aṭhār, 1427 AH.
- Hāshimī Shāhrūdī, Sayyid Maḥmūd (supervisor). Farhang-i fiqh muṭābiq-i madhhab-i Ahl al-Bayt (a). Qom, Muʾassasa-yi Dāʾirat al-Maʿārif-i Fiqh-i Islāmī, 1387 Sh.
- Ḥurr al-ʿĀmilī, Muḥammad b. al-Ḥasan al-. Wasāʾil al-Shīʿa. Edited by Sayyid Muḥammad Riḍā Ḥusaynī Jalālī. Qom, Muʾassasat Āl al-Bayt, 1416 AH.
- Ḥusayn-Pūr, Khusraw & Faḍl Allāh Mūsawī. "Ḍamān-i pizishk az manẓar-i fiqh-i Imāmiyya". Taḥqīqāt-i ḥuqūq-i bayn al-milalī. No. 36, Summer 1396 Sh.
- Ibn Idrīs, Muḥammad b. Aḥmad. Al-Sarāʾir al-ḥāwī li-taḥrīr al-fatāwī. Qom, Muʾassasat al-Nashr al-Islāmī, 1410 AH.
- Ismāʿīl-Ābādī, ʿAlī Riḍā. "Ngāhī taṭbīqī bi ḍamān-i ṭabīb dar madhāhib-i Islāmī". Fiqh. No. 40, Tīr 1383 Sh.
- Khudābakhshī, Ḥasan, et al. "Bāzshināsī-yi mafhūmī-yi ḍamān wa aqsām-i ān dar fiqh-i Islāmī". Mabānī-yi fiqhī ḥuqūqī-yi Islāmī. No. 2, Vol. 12, Autumn & Winter 1398 Sh.
- Kulaynī, Muḥammad b. Yaʿqūb al-. Al-Kāfī. Edited by Muḥammad Ākhūndī & ʿAlī Akbar Ghaffārī. Tehran, Dār al-Kutub al-Islāmiyya, 1407 AH.
- Majlisī, Muḥammad Bāqir al-. Biḥār al-anwār. Beirut, Dār Iḥyāʾ al-Turāth al-ʿArabī, n.d.
- Muqaddas al-Ardabīlī, Aḥmad b. Muḥammad al-. Majmaʿ al-fāʾida wa l-burhān. Qom, Muʾassasat al-Nashr al-Islāmī, 1403 AH.
- Mūsawī Bujnūrdī, Sayyid Muḥammad & Zahrā Ḥaq-Muḥammadī Fard. "Masʾūliyyat-i madanī wa kayfarī-yi pizishk bā takiyya bar ārā-yi Imām Khumaynī". Matīn. No. 34-35, 1386 Sh.
- Nāʾīnī, Mīrzā Muḥammad Ḥusayn. Munyat al-ṭālib fī ḥāshiyat al-makāsib. Tehran, al-Maktaba al-Muḥammadiyya, 1373 AH.
- Najafī, Muḥammad Ḥasan al-. Jawāhir al-kalām fī sharḥ sharāʾiʿ al-Islām. Edited by ʿAbbās Qūchānī & ʿAlī Ākhūndī. Beirut, Dār Iḥyāʾ al-Turāth al-ʿArabī, 7th edition, 1362 Sh.
- Qāsimī, Muḥammad ʿAlī. Dānishnāma-yi fiqh-i pizishkī. Qom, Markaz-i Fiqhī-yi Aʾimma-yi Aṭhār, 1395 Sh.
- Shahīd al-Thānī, Zayn al-Dīn b. ʿAlī al-. Al-Rawḍa al-bahiyya fī sharḥ al-lumʿa al-Dimashqiyya. Annotated by Sayyid Muḥammad Kalāntar. Qom, Intishārāt-i Dāwarī, 1410 AH.
- Shahīd al-Thānī, Zayn al-Dīn b. ʿAlī al-. Masālik al-afhām. Qom, Bunyād-i Maʿārif-i Islāmī, 1423 AH.
- Shawkānī, Muḥammad al-. Nayl al-awṭār. Beirut, Dār al-Fikr, 1414 AH.
- Ṭabāṭabāʾī, Sayyid ʿAlī al-. Riyāḍ al-masāʾil. Qom, Muʾassasat al-Nashr al-Islāmī, 1422 AH.