Mixed permissible and impermissible properties
Mixed permissible and impermissible properties are the properties part of which are acquired through permissible ways and the rest is acquired through impermissible ways.[1] The difference between such properties with questionable properties is that regarding questionable properties, there is doubt about mixing of permissible and impermissible properties.[2]
In Islamic jurisprudence, it is not permissible to use properties while it is mixed with permissible and impermissible properties.[3] According to Shiite jurists:
- If the amount and the owner of the impermissible property are known, it is obligatory to return the impermissible property to its owner.[4]
- If the amount of impermissible property is known but the owner is unknown, according to the fatwa of a group of jurists, that amount should be given as charity on behalf of the owner, and based on obligatory precaution, permission should be obtained from the shari'a ruler.[5]
- If the owner of the impermissible property is known but the amount is unknown, according to explicit opinion of a group of jurists, he must be satisfied, and if he is not satisfied, then the amount that is definitely his should be given to him.[6]
- If neither the amount, nor the owner of the impermissible property is known, Shi'a jurists have considered the mixed property among the cases where giving its khums is obligatory, in such a way that one-fifth of the total property must be paid as khums.[7] This fatwa is the opinion of famous Shi'a jurists.[8]It has been said that paying khums of mixed property is not obligatory according to Sunnis.[9]
- If, after paying khums of the mixed property, the owner is found, according to the opinion of some marja's such as Imam Khomeini, Sayyid Ali Sistani and Makarim Shirazi, based on obligatory precaution, it should be given to him to the amount of his property, and according to the opinion of a group of jurists such as Sayyid Abu al-Qasim Khoei, Gulpayigani, Araki and Mirza Jawad Tabrizi, there is no need to give the owner anything.[10]
Notes
- ↑ Muntaẓirī, Mabānī-yi fiqhī-yi ḥukūmat-i Islāmī, vol. 6, p. 184.
- ↑ Muntaẓirī, Mabānī-yi fiqhī-yi ḥukūmat-i Islāmī, vol. 6, p. 184.
- ↑ See: Shaykh Anṣārī, Kitāb al-khums, p. 111; Shahīd al-Thānī, Masālik al-ifhām, vol. 3, p. 141.
- ↑ Baḥrānī, al-Ḥadāʾiq al-nāḍira, vol. 12, p. 364; Iṣfahānī, Wasīlat al-najāt, vol. 1, p. 318.
- ↑ Imām Khomeinī, Tawḍīh al-masāʾil, Issue 1814.
- ↑ Khomeinī, Tawḍīh al-masāʾil, Issue 1815.
- ↑ See: Najafī, Jawāhir al-kalām, vol. 16, p. 69; Khomeinī, Tawḍīh al-masāʾil, vol. 2, p. 47.
- ↑ Shāhrūdī, Farhang-i fiqh muṭābiq bā madhhab-i Ahl al-Bayt, vol. 3, p. 499; Iṣfahānī, Wasīlat al-najāt, vol. 1, p. 318; Khomeinī, Tawḍīh al-masāʾil, Issue 1813.
- ↑ Anṣārī Shīrāzī, Mawsūʿat aḥkām al-aṭfāl wa adillatihā, vol. 1, p. 470.
- ↑ Khomeinī, Tawḍīh al-masāʾil, Issue 1817.
References
- Anṣārī Shīrāzī, Qudrat Allāh. Mawsūʿat aḥkām al-aṭfāl wa adillati-hā. Qom: Markaz-i Fiqhī-yi Aʾimma Aṭhār, 1429
- Baḥrānī, Yūsuf al-. Al-Ḥadāʾiq al-nāḍira fī aḥkām al-ʿitrat al-ṭāhira. Edited by Muḥammad Taqī Irawānī and Sayyid ʿAbd al-Razzāq al-Muqarram. Qom: Intishārāt-i Islāmī, 1405 AH.
- Imām Khomeinī. Tawḍīh al-masāʾil. Edition 8. Qom: Daftar-i Intishārāt-i Islāmī, 1424 AH.
- Iṣfahānī, Abu l-Ḥasan. Wasīlat al-najāt. Qom: Intishārāt-i Mehr-i Ustwār, 1993.
- Muntaẓirī, Ḥusayn ʿAlī. Mabānī-yi fiqhī-yi ḥukūmat-i Islāmī. Translated by Maḥmūd Ṣalawātī and Abu l-Faḍl Shakūrī. Qom: Muʾassisa-yi Keyhān, 1409 AH.
- Najafī, Muḥammad al-Ḥasan al-. Jawāhir al-kalām fī sharḥ sharāʾiʿ al-Islām. Beirut: Dār Iḥyāʾ al-Turāth al-ʿArabī, 1404 AH.
- Shahīd al-Thānī, Zayn al-Dīn b. ʿAlī. Masālik al-ifhām ilā tanqīh sharāyiʿ al-Islām. 1st edition. Qom: Muʾassisat al-Maʿārif al-Islāmīyya, 1413 AH.
- Shāhrūdī, Sayyid Maḥmūd. Farhang-i fiqh muṭābiq bā madhhab-i Ahl al-Bayt. Qom: Muʾassisat Dāʾirat al-Maʿārif al-Fiqh al-Islāmī, 1426.
- Shaykh Anṣārī, Murtaḍā b. Muḥammad Amīn. Kitāb al-khums. Qom: Kungira-yi Jahānī Buzurgdāsht-i Sheikh Aʿzam Anṣārī, 1415 AH.