Jump to content

Incident of the attack on the house of Lady Fatima (a): Difference between revisions

tag: notes and references
(tag:notes)
(tag: notes and references)
Line 64: Line 64:
[['Umar b. Khattab]] went to Fatima’s (a) house by the order of Abu Bakr to take Ali (a) and his companions for allegiance. When he was confronted by refusal of the people of the house, he ordered firewood to be collected and threatened to set the house on fire with the people in it. ‘Umar’s threat of setting fire to the house has been reported in some Sunni sources such as ''al-‘Aqd al-farid'',<ref>Ibn ʿAbd Rabbih, ''al-ʿIqd al-farīd'', vol. 5, p. 13.</ref> ''[[Tarikh al-Tabari]]'',<ref>Ṭabarī, ''Tārīkh al-umam wa l-mulūk'', vol. 3, p. 202.</ref> ''Ansab al-ashraf'',<ref>Balādhurī, ''Ansāb al-ashrāf'', vol. 1, p. 586.</ref> ''al-Musannif'',<ref>Ibn Abī Shayba, ''al-Muṣannaf'', vol. 13, p. 469.</ref> and ''al-Imama wa al-siyasa''.<ref>Ibn Qutayba, ''al-Imāma wa l-sīyāsa'', vol. 1, p. 30.</ref> According to Ibn ‘Abd Rabbih, a writer and historian of the third/ninth and fourth/tenth centuries, Abu Bakr told ‘Umar that if the people of the house refused to come out, fight them. ‘Umar, holding a fire torch, threatened to burn the house if the people of the house would not pledge allegiance.<ref>Ibn ʿAbd Rabbih, ''al-ʿIqd al-farīd'', vol. 5, p. 13.</ref> According to ''al-Imama wa al-siyasa'', when ‘Umar made such a threat, he was told that Fatima (a) was in this house. ‘Umar replied: “Even though she (a) is at home.”<ref>Ibn Qutayba, ''al-Imāma wa l-sīyāsa'', vol. 1, p. 30- 31.</ref>
[['Umar b. Khattab]] went to Fatima’s (a) house by the order of Abu Bakr to take Ali (a) and his companions for allegiance. When he was confronted by refusal of the people of the house, he ordered firewood to be collected and threatened to set the house on fire with the people in it. ‘Umar’s threat of setting fire to the house has been reported in some Sunni sources such as ''al-‘Aqd al-farid'',<ref>Ibn ʿAbd Rabbih, ''al-ʿIqd al-farīd'', vol. 5, p. 13.</ref> ''[[Tarikh al-Tabari]]'',<ref>Ṭabarī, ''Tārīkh al-umam wa l-mulūk'', vol. 3, p. 202.</ref> ''Ansab al-ashraf'',<ref>Balādhurī, ''Ansāb al-ashrāf'', vol. 1, p. 586.</ref> ''al-Musannif'',<ref>Ibn Abī Shayba, ''al-Muṣannaf'', vol. 13, p. 469.</ref> and ''al-Imama wa al-siyasa''.<ref>Ibn Qutayba, ''al-Imāma wa l-sīyāsa'', vol. 1, p. 30.</ref> According to Ibn ‘Abd Rabbih, a writer and historian of the third/ninth and fourth/tenth centuries, Abu Bakr told ‘Umar that if the people of the house refused to come out, fight them. ‘Umar, holding a fire torch, threatened to burn the house if the people of the house would not pledge allegiance.<ref>Ibn ʿAbd Rabbih, ''al-ʿIqd al-farīd'', vol. 5, p. 13.</ref> According to ''al-Imama wa al-siyasa'', when ‘Umar made such a threat, he was told that Fatima (a) was in this house. ‘Umar replied: “Even though she (a) is at home.”<ref>Ibn Qutayba, ''al-Imāma wa l-sīyāsa'', vol. 1, p. 30- 31.</ref>


In the sources, the names of some of those who accompanied ‘Umar in this attack are mentioned, including [[Usayd b. Hudayr]], Salama b. Salama b. Waqsh,<ref>In another narration, Salma b. Aslam b. Juraysh is mentioned.</ref> Thabit b. Qays b. Shammas Khazraji, [['Abd al-Rahman b. 'Awf]], Muhammad b. Muslima and Zayd b. Aslam.
In the sources, the names of some of those who accompanied ‘Umar in this attack are mentioned, including [[Usayd b. Hudayr]], Salama b. Salama b. Waqsh,<ref>In another narration, Salma b. Aslam b. Juraysh is mentioned.</ref> Thabit b. Qays b. Shammas Khazraji,<ref>Shaybānī Baghdādī, ''al-Sunna'', vol. 2, p. 553; Dīyārbakrī, ''Tārīkh al-khamīs'', vol. 2, p. 169.</ref> [['Abd al-Rahman b. 'Awf]], Muhammad b. Muslima<ref>Ibn Kathīr, ''al-Bidāya wa l-nihāya'', vol. 5, p. 270.</ref> and Zayd b. Aslam.<ref>Ḥillī,  ''Nahj al-ḥaq'', p. 271.</ref>


[[Sayyid Ja'far Shahidi]] believes that ‘Umar’s threat to burn down Fatima’s (a) house, quoted in ''Ansab al-ashraf'' and ''al-‘Aqd al-farid'' among [[Sunni]] sources, could not be fabricated by Shiite sympathizers or their friends’ political factions because Shiites had no power in the first/seventh centuries and were a minority. Moreover, the report is recorded in western Islamic sources where Shiites were not present. Shahidi believes that those present in Saqifa were more concerned with the government than with religion.
[[Sayyid Ja'far Shahidi]] believes that ‘Umar’s threat to burn down Fatima’s (a) house, quoted in ''Ansab al-ashraf''<ref>Balādhurī, ''Ansāb al-ashrāf'', vol. 1, p. 586.</ref> and ''al-‘Aqd al-farid''<ref>Ibn ʿAbd Rabbih, ''al-ʿIqd al-farīd'', vol. 5, p. 13.</ref> among [[Sunni]] sources, could not be fabricated by Shiite sympathizers or their friends’ political factions because Shiites had no power in the first/seventh centuries and were a minority. Moreover, the report is recorded in western Islamic sources where Shiites were not present. Shahidi believes that those present in Saqifa were more concerned with the government than with religion.<ref>Shahīdī, ''Zindigānī-i ʿAlī b. Ḥusayn (a)'', p. 109, 111- 112.</ref>


===Setting the door on fire, Injuring Fatima (a) and Abortion of Muhsin (a)===
===Setting the door on fire, Injuring Fatima (a) and Abortion of Muhsin (a)===


In some early Shiite sources, it is narrated that in the incident of attacking Fatima’s (a) house, they set fire to the door of the house and Fatima (a) was injured and her unborn child was aborted. In the ''book of Sulaym b. Qays'', it is said that ‘Umar b. Khattab carried out his threat, set fire to the door of Fatima’s (a) house, entered the house and when he faced the resistance of Fatima (a), he struck her side of abdomen with a sword sheath. It is also mentioned in the book of ''[[Ithbat al-wasiyya]]'' attributed to [[Ali b. Husayn al-Mas'udi]], a historian of the fourth/tenth century: “They stormed the house and set fire to its door, and forced Ali (a) out and pressed the Master of All Women (a) behind the door, so that [[Al-Muhsin b. al-Imam Ali (a)|Muhsin (a)]] was aborted.” In the report of ''[[Dala'il al-Imama]]'', it is mentioned that [[Umar]] ordered [[Qunfudh]] to beat Fatima (a).
In some early Shiite sources, it is narrated that in the incident of attacking Fatima’s (a) house, they set fire to the door of the house and Fatima (a) was injured and her unborn child was aborted. In the ''book of Sulaym b. Qays'', it is said that ‘Umar b. Khattab carried out his threat, set fire to the door of Fatima’s (a) house, entered the house and when he faced the resistance of Fatima (a), he struck her side of abdomen with a sword sheath.<ref>Hilālī, ''Kitāb Sulaym b. Qays '', vol. 1, p. 150.</ref> It is also mentioned in the book of ''[[Ithbat al-wasiyya]]'' attributed to [[Ali b. Husayn al-Mas'udi]], a historian of the fourth/tenth century: “They stormed the house and set fire to its door, and forced Ali (a) out and pressed the Master of All Women (a) behind the door, so that [[Al-Muhsin b. al-Imam Ali (a)|Muhsin (a)]] was aborted.”<ref> Masʿūdī, ''Ithbāt al-waṣiyya'', vol. 1, p. 146.</ref> In the report of ''[[Dala'il al-Imama]]'', it is mentioned that [[Umar]] ordered [[Qunfudh]] to beat Fatima (a).<ref>Ṭabarī, ''Dalāʾil al-imāma'', p. 134.</ref>
[[Al-Ayashi]], a Shiite narrator in the [[Minor Occultation]] period, also said that ‘Umar kicked at the door of the house, which was made of palm branches, broke it and entered the house and took Ali (a) out with his shoulders tied.
 
[[Al-Ayashi]], a Shiite narrator in the [[Minor Occultation]] period, also said that ‘Umar kicked at the door of the house, which was made of palm branches, broke it and entered the house and took Ali (a) out with his shoulders tied.<ref>ʿAyyāshī, ''Tafsīr al-ʿAyyāshī'', vol. 2, p. 67.</ref>


===Time of the Incident===
===Time of the Incident===


Muhammad Hadi Yusufi Gharawi, a researcher in the history of [[Islam]] and [[Shiism]], based on some evidences, believes that the time of the attack on Lady Fatima’s (a) house was not immediately after the [[incident of Saqifa]] and allegiance to Abu Bakr, but about fifty days or more after the [[demise of the Prophet (s)]]. The first evidence is that a person named [[Burayda b. al-Husayb al-Aslami]], who had gone to [[Muta]] with [[Usama b. Zayd's Army|Usama’s army]], after returning to [[Medina]] and learning about the Saqifa incident, along with some members of his tribe, supported Imam Ali (a) and said that “if Ali (a) does not pledge allegiance, we will not pledge allegiance either.” It was after this incident that the caliph and his entourage thought of taking Imam Ali’s (a) allegiance. According to Yusufi Gharawi, considering the time of the army’s return and the events before and after it, the incident of the invasion occurred about fifty days after the demise of the Prophet (s). Another evidence is that after the [[usurpation of Fadak]], which occurred ten days after the demise of the Prophet (s), Fatima (a) went to the mosque and recited a sermon which became known as the [[sermon of Fadak]]. Yusufi Gharawi, from the descriptions of how Fatima (a) walked on the way to the mosque (including that her walk was no different from the walk of the Prophet (s)) concluded that the attack did not take place before the time of Fatima’s (a) sermon, because with the injuries she (a) had received from the attack, Fatima (a) could not walk like that. The third evidence is that after the incident of Saqifa and the confiscation of Fadak, Imam Ali (a), along with Fatima (a) and [[Imam al-Hasan (a)]] and [[Imam al-Husayn (a)]], went to the house of the [[Emigrants]] and the [[Helpers]] at night to ask them for help to take their rights. If the attack had taken place before this date, Fatima (a) would not have been able to accompany them with the injuries she (a) had received.
Muhammad Hadi Yusufi Gharawi, a researcher in the history of [[Islam]] and [[Shiism]], based on some evidences, believes that the time of the attack on Lady Fatima’s (a) house was not immediately after the [[incident of Saqifa]] and allegiance to Abu Bakr, but about fifty days or more after the [[demise of the Prophet (s)]]. The first evidence is that a person named [[Burayda b. al-Husayb al-Aslami]], who had gone to [[Muta]] with [[Usama b. Zayd's Army|Usama’s army]], after returning to [[Medina]] and learning about the Saqifa incident, along with some members of his tribe, supported Imam Ali (a) and said that “if Ali (a) does not pledge allegiance, we will not pledge allegiance either.” It was after this incident that the caliph and his entourage thought of taking Imam Ali’s (a) allegiance. According to Yusufi Gharawi, considering the time of the army’s return and the events before and after it, the incident of the invasion occurred about fifty days after the demise of the Prophet (s). Another evidence is that after the [[usurpation of Fadak]], which occurred ten days after the demise of the Prophet (s), Fatima (a) went to the mosque and recited a sermon which became known as the [[sermon of Fadak]]. Yusufi Gharawi, from the descriptions of how Fatima (a) walked on the way to the mosque (including that her walk was no different from the walk of the Prophet (s)) concluded that the attack did not take place before the time of Fatima’s (a) sermon, because with the injuries she (a) had received from the attack, Fatima (a) could not walk like that. The third evidence is that after the incident of Saqifa and the confiscation of Fadak, Imam Ali (a), along with Fatima (a) and [[Imam al-Hasan (a)]] and [[Imam al-Husayn (a)]], went to the house of the [[Emigrants]] and the [[Helpers]] at night to ask them for help to take their rights. If the attack had taken place before this date, Fatima (a) would not have been able to accompany them with the injuries she (a) had received.<ref>Yūsufī Gharawī, ''Tārīkh-i hujūm bi khana-yi Ḥaḍrat-i Zahrā (a)''. p. 14.</ref>


==Consequences==
==Consequences==
Line 83: Line 84:
===Fatima’s (a) dissatisfaction with Abu Bakr and ‘Umar===
===Fatima’s (a) dissatisfaction with Abu Bakr and ‘Umar===


In the ''[[book of Sulaym b. Qays]]'', ''[[al-Imama wa al-siyasa]]'', and the book ''[[Dala'il al-Imama]]'', it is mentioned that after the incident of the attack on Fatima’s (a) house, Abu Bakr and ‘Umar tried to apologize and satisfy Fatima (a) and went to visit her. Fatima (a) did not accept to see them, but the two asked Imam Ali (a) to mediate and they met with Fatima (a). In this meeting, Fatima (a) turned away from them and reminded them of the words of the [[Prophet (s)]] that “Fatima (a) is part of my body, whoever hurts her, has hurt me” and then said, “I take God as witness that you two annoyed me and made me angry.”
In the ''[[book of Sulaym b. Qays]]'', ''[[al-Imama wa al-siyasa]]'', and the book ''[[Dala'il al-Imama]]'', it is mentioned that after the incident of the attack on Fatima’s (a) house, Abu Bakr and ‘Umar tried to apologize and satisfy Fatima (a) and went to visit her. Fatima (a) did not accept to see them, but the two asked Imam Ali (a) to mediate and they met with Fatima (a). In this meeting, Fatima (a) turned away from them and reminded them of the words of the [[Prophet (s)]] that “Fatima (a) is part of my body, whoever hurts her, has hurt me” and then said, “I take God as witness that you two annoyed me and made me angry.”<ref>Hilālī, ''Kitāb Sulaym b. Qays '', vol. 1, p. 869; Ibn Qutayba, ''al-Imāma wa l-sīyāsa'', vol. 1, p. 31; Ṭabarī, ''Dalāʾil al-imāma'', p. 134- 135.</ref>


===Abortion of Muhsin (a) and Martyrdom of Fatima (a)===
===Abortion of Muhsin (a) and Martyrdom of Fatima (a)===
Line 89: Line 90:
The oldest source that narrates the abortion of Muhsin (a) in the invasion of the house is the ''book of Sulaym b. Qays'' among the sources of the first/seventh century and most of later Shiite sources such as ''[[al-Ihtijaj]]'' by [[Ahmad b. Ali al-Tabrisi]], ''[[Ghayat al-maram]]'' by [[Sayyid Hashim al-Bahrani]] and ''[[Bihar al-anwar]]'' by [[Allamah al-Majlisi]] quoted it from that book.
The oldest source that narrates the abortion of Muhsin (a) in the invasion of the house is the ''book of Sulaym b. Qays'' among the sources of the first/seventh century and most of later Shiite sources such as ''[[al-Ihtijaj]]'' by [[Ahmad b. Ali al-Tabrisi]], ''[[Ghayat al-maram]]'' by [[Sayyid Hashim al-Bahrani]] and ''[[Bihar al-anwar]]'' by [[Allamah al-Majlisi]] quoted it from that book.


According to a narration from [[Imam al-Sadiq (a)]], the cause of Fatima’s (a) martyrdom was injuries she (a) received during the attack on the house.
According to a narration from [[Imam al-Sadiq (a)]], the cause of Fatima’s (a) martyrdom was injuries she (a) received during the attack on the house.<ref>Allāh Akbarī, ''Muḥsin b. ʿAlī (a)'', p. 69.</ref>


===Abu Bakr’s Regret===
===Abu Bakr’s Regret===


Some Sunni sources such as ''Tarikh Madinat al-Dimashq'' by Ibn ‘Asaker, ''al-Mu'jam al-kabir'' by al-Tabarani and ''Tarikh al-Islam'' by al-Dhahabi state that in the last hours of his life, Abu Bakr regretted doing three things and as one of them, said that he wished he had not ordered to enter the house of Fatima (a).
Some Sunni sources such as ''Tarikh Madinat al-Dimashq''<ref>Ibn ʿAsākir, ''Tārīkh madīnat Dimashq'', vol. 42, p. 422.</ref> by Ibn ‘Asaker, ''al-Mu'jam al-kabir''<ref>Ṭabarānī, ''al-Muʿjam al-kabīr'', vol. 1, p. 62.</ref> by al-Tabarani and ''Tarikh al-Islam''<ref>Dhahabī, ''Tārīkh al-Islām'', vol. 3, p. 118.</ref> by al-Dhahabi state that in the last hours of his life, Abu Bakr regretted doing three things and as one of them, said that he wished he had not ordered to enter the house of Fatima (a).


==Sunni Views==
==Sunni Views==


Reports of [[Umar b. Khattab]] threatening to set fire to Fatima’s (a) house are mentioned in Sunni sources such as ''Ansab al-ashraf'', ''Tarikh al-Tabari'', ''al-'Aqd al-farid'', ''al-Musannaf'', and ''al-Imama wa al-siyasa'', but they have denied actually setting fire to the house and injuring Fatima (a) by pressure of the door and the abortion of Muhsin (a), and accused the narrators of such reports of being [[Rafidi]] [“dissenter”].
Reports of [[Umar b. Khattab]] threatening to set fire to Fatima’s (a) house are mentioned in Sunni sources such as ''Ansab al-ashraf'',<ref>Balādhurī, ''Ansāb al-ashrāf'', vol. 1, p. 586.</ref> ''Tarikh al-Tabari'',<ref>Ṭabarī, ''Tārīkh al-umam wa l-mulūk'', vol. 3, p. 202.</ref> ''al-'Aqd al-farid'',<ref>Ibn ʿAbd Rabbih, ''al-ʿIqd al-farīd'', vol. 5, p. 13.</ref> ''al-Musannaf'',<ref>Ibn Abī Shayba, ''al-Muṣannaf'', vol. 13, p. 469.</ref> and ''al-Imama wa al-siyasa'',<ref>Ibn Qutayba, ''al-Imāma wa l-sīyāsa'', vol. 1, p. 30.</ref> but they have denied actually setting fire to the house and injuring Fatima (a) by pressure of the door and the abortion of Muhsin (a), and accused the narrators of such reports of being [[Rafidi]] [“dissenter”].
Muhammad b. 'Abd al-Karim al-Shahristani, the [[Ash'arite]] writer of denominations of different nations (d. 548/1153-4), in his introduction to al-Hudhayliyyah, a [[Mu'tazilite]] sect, says that they believe that ‘Umar harmed Fatima (a) on the day of taking allegiance and caused her unborn child to be aborted. Shahristani calls this report a lie.
Muhammad b. 'Abd al-Karim al-Shahristani, the [[Ash'arite]] writer of denominations of different nations (d. 548/1153-4), in his introduction to al-Hudhayliyyah, a [[Mu'tazilite]] sect, says that they believe that ‘Umar harmed Fatima (a) on the day of taking allegiance and caused her unborn child to be aborted. Shahristani calls this report a lie.<ref>Shahristānī. ''al-Milal wa al-niḥal'', vol. 1, p. 57.</ref>


Khalil b. Ibak al-Safdi (d. 746/1345-6) in ''al-Wafi bil-wafayat'', in introducing Ibrahim b. Sayyar known as Nazzam, one of the great Mu’tazilites, considers him inclined to Rafida and quotes him as saying that ‘Umar harmed Fatima (a) and caused the abortion of Muhsin (a).
Khalil b. Ibak al-Safdi (d. 746/1345-6) in ''al-Wafi bil-wafayat'', in introducing Ibrahim b. Sayyar known as Nazzam, one of the great Mu’tazilites, considers him inclined to Rafida and quotes him as saying that ‘Umar harmed Fatima (a) and caused the abortion of Muhsin (a).<ref>Ṣafadī, ''al-Wāfī'', vol. 6, p. 15.</ref>


Shams al-Din al-Dhahabi (d. 748/1347-8) in ''Sayr a'lam al-nubala'', in introducing Ibn Abi Daram, the fourth/tenth century narrator in [[Kufa]], calls him a leader, a guardian and knowledgeable, but considers his inclination toward Rafida as the cause of his unreliability and says that in the end of his life, defects of caliphs were recited to him, including that ‘Umar had harmed Fatima (a) and caused her to have an abortion. For this reason, al-Dhahabi considered him astray. Ibn Hajar 'Asqalani (d. 852/1448-9) also considered Ibn Abi Daram as a Rafidiyy and liar in ''Lisan al-mizan'' for quoting reports of the [caliphs’] defects including Fatima’s (a) abortion.
Shams al-Din al-Dhahabi (d. 748/1347-8) in ''Sayr a'lam al-nubala'', in introducing Ibn Abi Daram, the fourth/tenth century narrator in [[Kufa]], calls him a leader, a guardian and knowledgeable, but considers his inclination toward Rafida as the cause of his unreliability and says that in the end of his life, defects of caliphs were recited to him, including that ‘Umar had harmed Fatima (a) and caused her to have an abortion. For this reason, al-Dhahabi considered him astray. Ibn Hajar 'Asqalani (d. 852/1448-9) also considered Ibn Abi Daram as a Rafidiyy and liar in ''Lisan al-mizan'' for quoting reports of the [caliphs’] defects including Fatima’s (a) abortion.
confirmed, movedable
793

edits