Abandoned hadith
Abandoned hadith or Hadīth al-matrūk (Arabic: الحديث المتروك) is a hadith narrated by a person who is accused of forgery and whose hadiths are against obvious or well-established principles. The term is also applied to hadiths whose transmitters would make many mistakes in hadith transmission or would commit many sins and misdeeds. Some scholars have used the term hadith munkar (unknown hadith) interchangeably with abandoned hadith; others have considered the term abandoned hadith synonymous with deserted hadith (hadith matruk), but most hadith scholars differentiate between the two.
Abandoned hadiths are a category of rejected hadiths (hadith mardud). Shiite rijal scholars have used this term less frequently than Sunni scholars.
The transmitters of this type of hadiths are categorized as matruk (abandoned) or matruk al-hadith (one whose hadith is abandoned).
Introduction
Hadith matruk (abandoned hadith) is a term in the science of diraya,[1] which indicates a hadith narrated by a transmitter who is accused of forgery and which is not narrated by any other transmitters and its content is against obvious or well-established principles.[2] The term is applied to the hadiths of those transmitters known as liars, even if there is no evidence of their lying in their hadiths.[3] According to another definition, which is given mostly by Sunni hadith scholars, an abandoned hadith is a hadith whose transmitters often made mistakes or committed many sins.[4]
The abandoned hadith is a subcategory of the rejected hadith,[5] which jurists do not regard as authoritative. [6]
Examples of abandoned hadiths include the hadiths transmitted by Umar b. Shamir from Jabir al-Ju'fi.[7]
Similarities and Differences with Other Unreliable Hadiths
Abandoned hadiths are sometimes called mahjur (deserted) or munkar (unknown).[8] Although abandoned hadiths are similar to forged (mawdu') hadiths, scholars do not consider them the same, because the fact that abandoned hadiths were narrated by people who were accused of lying or forgery does not necessarily mean that they were forged.[9]
According to al-Mamaqani (b. 1290/1873-4 - d. 1351/1932-3), Ibn Hajar and Shaykh Tahir al-Jaza'iri considered "abandoned hadith" (matruk) synonymous with thrown (matruh) hadith, but most scholars maintain that they are different.[10]
According to some scholars, these confusions and disagreements are because rijal sources do not adequately explain their terminology, and there is almost no way for ascertaining the intended meanings of some of these terms.[11]
Categorization and Usage
In rijal sources, some hadith transmitters are described as matruk (abandoned) or matruk al-hadith (one whose hadiths are abandoned).[12] Besides the terms liar (kadhdhab) and forger (wadda'), these terms indicate the unreliability of the hadith transmitter in question.[13] These two terms are mostly used in Sunni rijal sources.
However, in early Shiite rijal sources (e.g., Rijal of al-Najashi or the Rijal of al-Shaykh al-Tusi), the terms matruk or matruk al-hadith are not much used, and only in the Rijal of Ibn Ghada'iri they have been applied to a few hadith transmitters.[14] However, although they rarely used these terms, early Shiite rijal scholars would use other expressions that conveyed the same meaning with other expressions such as "He was weak in his hadith"[15] or "There is doubt in his hadiths."[16]
Some later scholars categorized abandoned hadiths under weak hadiths[17] or under khabar al-wahid.[18]
See Also
Notes
- ↑ Group of authors, Farhang-i fiqh, vol. 3, p. 278.
- ↑ Subḥānī, Usul al-ḥadīth, p. 95.
- ↑ Khaṭīb, Uṣūl al-ḥadīth, p. 229.
- ↑ Qāsimī, Qawaʾid al-taḥadīth, p. 209; Ṣubḥī Ṣāliḥ, ʿUlūm al-ḥadīth wa iṣṭilaḥat-i ān, p. 156; Khaṭīb, Uṣūl al-ḥadīth, p. 229.
- ↑ Qāsimī, Qawaʾid al-taḥadīth, p. 209; Marʿashlī, ʿUlūm al-ḥadīth al-sharīf, p. 90.
- ↑ Group of authors, Farhang-i fiqh, vol. 3, p. 278.
- ↑ Khaṭīb, Uṣūl al-ḥadīth wa ulūmih wa muṣṭalaḥih, p. 229.
- ↑ Group of authors, Farhang-i fiqh, vol. 3, p. 278.
- ↑ Marʿashlī, ʿUlūm al-ḥadīth al-sharīf, p. 102; Qāsimī, Qawaʾid al-taḥadīth, p. 209.
- ↑ Māmaqānī, Miqbās al-hidāya, vol. 1, p. 316.
- ↑ Mihrīzī, Ḥadīth pazhūhī, vol. 1, p. 113.
- ↑ Ibn Ghaḍāʾirī, Rijāl Ibn Ghaḍāʾirī, p. 48, 78.
- ↑ Kujūrī Shīrazī, al-Fawāʾid al-rijālīyya, p. 120.
- ↑ Ibn Ghaḍāʾirī, Rijāl Ibn Ghaḍāʾirī, p. 48, 78.
- ↑ Ṭūsī, al-Rijāl al-Ṭūsī, p. 48.
- ↑ Ṭūsī, al-Rijāl al-Ṭūsī, p. 39.
- ↑ Ṣubḥī Ṣāliḥ, ʿUlūm al-ḥadīth wa iṣṭilaḥat-i ān, p. 156; Khaṭīb, Uṣūl al-ḥadīth wa ulūmih wa muṣṭalaḥih, p. 229.
- ↑ Group of authors, Farhang-i fiqh, vol. 3, p. 278.
References
- Group of authors. under supervision of Sayyid Maḥmūd Shāhrūdī. Farhang-i fiqh muṭābiq-i madhhab-i Ahl al-Bayt (a). Qom: Muʾassisa-yi Dāʾirat al-Maʿārif-i Fiqh-i Islāmī bar Madhahb-i Ahl al-Bayt (a), 1426 AH.
- Ḥāfizīyan, Abu l-Faḍl. Rasaʾil fī dirāyat al-ḥadīth. 2nd edition. Qom: Muʾassisa ʿIlmī Farhangī Dār al-Ḥadīth, 1384 Sh.
- Ibn Ghaḍāʾirī, Aḥmad b. Ḥusayn. Rijāl Ibn Ghaḍāʾirī. Qom: Muʾassisa Ilmī wa Farhangī Dār al-Ḥadīth, 1422 AH.
- Jadīdīnijād, Muḥammad Riḍā. Dānish-i rijāl az dīdgāh-i Ahl-i Sunnat. Qom: Muʾassisa ʿIlmī Farhangī Dār al-Ḥadīth, 1381 Sh.
- Khaṭīb, Muḥammad ʿAjjāj. Uṣūl al-ḥadīth wa ulūmih wa muṣṭalaḥih. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr, 1428 AH.
- Kujūrī Shīrazī, Muḥammad Mahdī. Al-Fawāʾid al-rijālīyya. Qom: Muʾassisa ʿIlmī Farhangī Dār al-Ḥadīth, 1424 AH.
- Marʿashlī, Yusuf. ʿUlūm al-ḥadīth al-sharīf. Beirut: Dār al-Maʿrifa, 1423 AH.
- Māmaqānī, ʿAbd Allāh b. Ḥasan. Miqbās al-hidāya. Qom: Muʾassisat Āl al-Bayt, 1411 AH.
- Mudīr Shānachī, Kāzim. Dirāyat al-ḥadīth. Qom: Daftar-i Intishārāt-i Islāmī, 1388 Sh.
- Mihrīzī, Mahdī. Ḥadīth pazhūhī. 2nd edition. Qom: Muʾassisa ʿIlmī Farhangī Dār al-Ḥadīth, 1390 Sh.
- Najāshī, Aḥmad b. ʿAlī al-. Fihrist asmāʾ muṣannifī al-Shīʿa. Qom: Muʾassisa Nashr-i Islāmī, 1365 Sh.
- Qāsimī, Jamāl al-Dīn. Qawaʾid al-taḥadīth min funūn al-muṣṭalaḥ al-ḥadīth. Beirut: Manshūrāt Marwān Riḍwān Daʿbūl, 1425 AH.
- Subḥānī, Jaʿfar. Usul al-ḥadīth wa ahkamih fi 'ilm al-diraya. Qom: Muʾassisat al-Nashr al-Islāmī, 1426 AH.
- Ṣubḥī Ṣāliḥ. ʿUlūm al-ḥadīth wa iṣṭilaḥat-i ān. Translated by Adil Nadir Ali. Qom: Intisharat-i Uswa, 1383 Sh.
- Ṭūsī, Muḥammad b. al-Ḥaasn al-. Al-Rijāl al-Ṭūsī. Qom: Muʾassisat al-Nashr al-Islāmī, 1415 AH.