Ijtihad Against Nass
Ijtihād Against Naṣṣ (Arabic: إجتِهاد في مقابل النَصّ, "Ijtihād against the Clear Text") refers to prioritizing a jurist's personal opinion over the clear statements of the Qur'an or the Infallibles (a). According to Shia jurists and most Sunni scholars, such ijtihad is considered an innovation. However, some Companions and certain Sunni jurists have favored their own opinions over explicit scriptural texts. For instance, 'Umar b. al-Khattab, through ijtihad against clear text, declared temporary marriage and the mut'a of Hajj to be prohibited. Sayyid Sharaf al-Din (d. 1377/1957) in his book al-Nass wa-l-ijtihad documented one hundred instances of ijtihad against clear texts by caliphs, rulers, and some of their associates during and after the time of the Prophet (s).
Definition and Significance
Ijtihad against clear text (nass) is defined as a jurist prioritizing his own personal conjecture or opinion over the clear command of God, the Prophet (s), or other Infallibles (a).[1] "Nass" refers to a clear, authoritative statement that has only one unambiguous meaning.[2]
Shia scholars oppose ijtihad in contradiction to the clear text. Nasir Makarim Shirazi argues that the spread of such ijtihad would lead to the erosion of the sanctity of all religious rulings.[3] Mirza Habibullah Khoei considers opposition to nass as an innovation.[4] According to Jawad al-Shahrastani in the introduction to Wasa'il al-Shi'a, jurists who engage in ijtihad against nass effectively portray the Prophet (s) as a jurist like themselves, whose ijtihad is susceptible to error.[5] Allama Tihrani identifies the Shia's adherence to nass and the Sunni transgression of it as the fundamental cause of disputes between Shia and Sunni.[6]
Rejection of Ijtihad Against Nass by the Majority of Jurists
Jurists of both Shia[7] and Sunni[8] schools consider ijtihad in opposition to definitive evidence to be invalid. Some Companions and Tabi'un never issued juristic opinions contrary to nass.[9] According to Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyya, a Sunni scholar, Ahmad b. Hanbal issued rulings based strictly on nass and did not accept opinions contradicting it, even from the caliphs.[10]
Nevertheless, some Sunni jurists occasionally prioritized their ijtihad over clear text.[11] Makarim Shirazi cites one of them stating that in matters of politics and transactions, if a nass conflicts with public interest (maslaha) and reconciliation between them is impossible, the public interest may take precedence over the nass. However, most Sunni jurists have opposed this view.[12]
Reasons for Opposition to Ijtihad Against Nass
Opponents of ijtihad against clear text, in addition to reasoning based on intellect,[13] have cited verses from the Qur'an and hadiths from both Shia and Sunni sources as evidence.
- Ja'far Subhani, a Shia authority, citing the Quran 49:1 and the necessity of submission to the commands of God and His Messenger (s), considers ijtihad against clear text as an act of preempting and prioritizing over them.[14]
- Nasir Makarim Shirazi, in his interpretation of Quran 4:65, considers it to prohibit any form of ijtihad or expression of opinion contrary to the clear text (nass) of the rulings of God and His Messenger (s).[15]
- Based on Quran 33:36, believers have no right to oppose the will of God and His Messenger (s), and any opinion or ijtihad contrary to them is forbidden.[16]
- According to a hadith cited in Sunni sources, a man from the Thaqif tribe asked the second caliph, 'Umar, about a matter concerning Hajj. Umar provided an answer, but the man responded, "I asked the Prophet (s) about this matter, and he gave a different answer." 'Umar became upset and said, "Why do you ask me about something on which the Prophet (s) has already given his opinion?"[17]
Examples of Sahaba's Ijtihad Against Nass
Despite the opposition of Shia and Sunni jurists to ijtihad against clear text, there are reported instances where some Companions of the Prophet (s) issued rulings directly opposing nass.[18] According to Shia scholars, the second caliph, 'Umar, was among the first to engage in ijtihad against the clear texts of the Qur'an and the Prophet (s).[19] It is said that his earliest instances of such ijtihad occurred in the well-known cases of temporary marriage and the mut'a of Hajj, which he declared forbidden on his own authority.[20]
Sharaf al-Din al-'Amili, in his book al-Nass wa-l-ijtihad, documents several instances of ijtihad against nass. In the seven chapters of this book, he lists one hundred cases of such ijtihad by caliphs, rulers, and some of their associates during or after the time of the Prophet (s).[21] Some of these cases include:
- The Event of Saqifa Bani Sa'ida
- Opposition to the commandership of Zayd b. Haritha
- Incompliance with the command to join Usama's army
- Usurpation of Fadak
- Murder of Malik b. Nuwayra at the command of Khalid b. Walid
- Forbidding any transcriptions of the Prophet's (s) words and hadiths
- Preventing the Prophet (s) from writing his will during the event of pen and paper
- Objecting to al-Hudaybiyya Peace Treaty
- Objecting to the Prophet's (s) word that worshipers of God go to Paradise
- Prohibiting Hajj al-Tamattu'
- Prohibiting temporary marriage
- Innovation in the adhan of the Morning Prayer
- Innovation in adhan and iqama
- Tarawih Prayer
- Omitting the prayer when there is no water
- Displacing the Ibrahim's standing place
- Prohibition of crying for the dead
- Wine and its forbiddance
- Performing full prayer during trips
- Khalid's massacre of the Banu Jadhimah tribe
It is noteworthy that Sunni jurists have defended these cases of ijtihad against nass.[22]
Notes
- ↑ Shāhrūdī, Farhang-i fiqh, vol. 1, p. 267; Yūsufī Muqaddam, Darāmadī bar ijtihād az manẓar-i Qurʾān, p. 276.
- ↑ Jurjānī, Kitāb al-taʿrīfāt, p. 994.
- ↑ Makārim Shīrāzī, Shīʿa pāsukh mīgūyad, p. 130-131.
- ↑ Hāshimī Khoei, Minhāj al-barāʿa, vol. 8, p. 188.
- ↑ Ḥurr al-ʿĀmilī, Wasāʾil al-Shīʿa, p. 18.
- ↑ Ḥusaynī Tihrānī, Wilāyat-i faqīh dar ḥukūmat-i Islāmī, vol. 1, p. 118.
- ↑ Mūsawī Qazwīnī, Yanābiʿ al-aḥkām, p. 501; Majlisī, Biḥār al-anwār, vol. 30, p. 515; Hāshimī Khoei, Minhāj al-barāʿa, vol. 8, p. 186; Sharaf al-Dīn Mūsawī, al-Naṣṣ wa l-ijtihād, p. 3; Mughnīya, Fī zilāl Nahj al-balāgha, vol. 1, p. 304.
- ↑ Sharaf al-Dīn Mūsawī, al-Naṣṣ wa l-ijtihād, p. 3; Faḍl Allāh, Dirāsāt fiqhīyya wa qānūnīyya, p. 38.
- ↑ Yūsufī Muqaddam, Darāmadī bar ijtihād az manẓar-i Qurʾān, p. 276.
- ↑ Ibn Qayyim al-Jawzīyya, Aʿlām al-muqiʿīn, p. 29.
- ↑ Qudsī, Anwār al-Uṣūl, vol. 3, p. 602.
- ↑ Qudsī, Anwār al-Uṣūl, vol. 3, p. 602.
- ↑ Subḥānī, al-Inṣāf, vol. 1, p. 35.
- ↑ Subḥānī, al-Inṣāf, vol. 1, p. 34.
- ↑ Makārim Shīrāzī, Tafsīr-i nimūna, vol. 3, p. 456.
- ↑ Yūsufī Muqaddam, Darāmadī bar ijtihād az manẓar-i Qurʾān, p. 284.
- ↑ Ḥusayni Mīlānī, Khulāṣat ʿAbaqāt al-anwār, vol. 3, p. 223; Ibn Ḥazm, al-Iḥkām, vol. 6, p. 807.
- ↑ Ibn Ḥazm, al-Iḥkām, vol. 2, p. 12; Ḥusayni Mīlānī, Khulāṣat ʿAbaqāt al-anwār, vol. 3, p. 222-227; Tījānī Samāwī, Thumma ihtadayt, p. 165-167.
- ↑ Markaz al-Abḥāth al-ʿAqāʾidīyya. Mawsūʿat min ḥayāt al-mustabṣirīn, vol. 9, p. 66.
- ↑ Makārim Shīrāzī, Shīʿa pāsukh mīgūyad, p. 128-130; Yūsufī Muqaddam, Darāmadī bar ijtihād az manẓar-i Qurʾān, p. 278.
- ↑ Sharaf al-Dīn Mūsawī, al-Naṣṣ wa l-ijtihād, p. 5.
- ↑ Ibn Ḥazm, al-Iḥkām, vol. 2, p. 16; Yūsufī Muqaddam, Darāmadī bar ijtihād az manẓar-i Qurʾān, p. 278.
References
- A group of authors. Farhangnāma-yi ʿulūm-i Qurʾānī. 1st edition. Qom: Pazhūhishgāh-i ʿUlūm wa Farhang Islāmī, 1394 Sh.
- Faḍl Allāh, Mahdī. Dirāsāt fiqhīyya wa qānūnīyya: Aḍwāʾ ʿalā al-Shūrā fī al-Naṣṣ al-Qurʾānī. Journal of Al-Thaqāfat al-Islamīyya. No 26. (1410 AH).
- Hāshimī Khoei, Mīrzā Ḥabībullāh. Minhāj al-barāʿa fī sharḥ Nahj al-balāgha. Edited by Ibrāhīm Mīyānajī. Translated by Ḥasan Ḥasanzāda Āmulī, Muḥammad Bāqir Kamaraʾī. 4th edition. Tehran: Maktabat al-Islāmīyya, 1400 AH.
- Ḥusaynī Tihrānī, Sayyid Muḥammad Ḥusayn. Wilāyat-i faqīh dar ḥukūmat-i Islāmī. 2nd edition. Mashhad: Intishārāt-i ʿAllāma Ṭabāṭabāʾī, 1421 AH.
- Ḥusaynī Mīlānī, Sayyid ʿAlī. Khulāṣat ʿAbaqāt al-anwār fī imāmat al-aʾimmat al-aṭhār. [n.p]: [n.n], 1405 AH.
- Ḥurr al-ʿĀmilī, Muḥammad b. al-Ḥasan al-. Wasāʾil al-Shīʿa. Edited by Jawād Shahristānī. 1st edition. Qom: Muʾassisat Āl al-Bayt (a), 1409 AH.
- Ibn Ḥazm, ʿAlī b. Muḥammad. Al-Iḥkām fī uṣūl al-aḥkām. Beirut: Dār al-Āfāq al-Jadīda, [n.d].
- Ibn Qayyim al-Jawzīyya, Muḥammad b. Abī Bakr. Aʿlām al-muqiʿīn ʿan rabb al-ʿālamīn. Edited by Muḥammad Muḥyi al-Dīn ʿAbd al-Ḥamīd. Beirut: Nashr al-Maktaba al-ʿAṣrīyya, 1407 AH.
- Jurjānī, ʿAlī b. Muḥammad. Kitāb al-taʿrīfāt. Cairo: Dār Faḍīla, 2004.
- Markaz al-Abḥāth al-ʿAqāʾidīyya. Mawsūʿat min ḥayāt al-mustabṣirīn. [n.p]: Markaz al-Abḥāth al-ʿAqāʾidiyya, 1433 AH.
- Mughnīya, Muḥammad Jawād. Fī zilāl Nahj al-balāgha. Beirut: Dār al-ʿIlm li-l-Malāyyīn, 1979.
- Makārim Shīrāzī, Nāṣir. Tafsīr-i nimūna. Tehran: Dār al-Kutub al-Islāmiyya, 1374 Sh.
- Makārim Shīrāzī, Nāṣir. Dāʾirat al-maʿārif-i fiqh-i muqārin. 1st edition. Qom: Intishārāt-i Madrisat Imām ʿAlī b. Abī Ṭālib (a), 1427 AH.
- Makārim Shīrāzī, Nāṣir. Shīʿa pāsukh mīgūyad. 8th edition. Qom: Intishārāt-i Madrisat Imām ʿAlī b. Abī Ṭālib (a), 1428 Sh.
- Mūsawī Qazwīnī, Sayyid ʿAlī. Yanābiʿ al-aḥkām fī maʿrifat al-ḥalāl wa l-ḥarām. Edited by Sayyid ʿAlī ʿAlawī Qazwīnī. [n.p]: Muʾassisat al-Nashr al-Islāmī, 1424 AH.
- Majlisī, Muḥammad Bāqir al-. Biḥār al-anwār. Second edition. Beirut: Dār Iḥyāʾ al-Turāth al-ʿArabī, 1403 AH.
- Qudsī, Aḥmad. Anwār al-Uṣūl; Taqrīrāt-i darsi Nāṣir Makārim Shīrāzī. 2nd edition. Qom: Intishārāt Nasl-i Jāwān, 1416 AH.
- Shāhrūdī, Sayyid Maḥmūd. Farhang-i fiqh muṭābiq bā madhhab-i Ahl al-Bayt. 2nd edition. Qom: Muʾassisat Dāʾirat al-Maʿārif al-Fiqh al-Islāmī, 1385 Sh.
- Subḥānī, Jaʿfar. Al-Inṣāf fī masāʾil dāma fīhā al-khilāf. Qom: Muʾassisa Imām Ṣādiq (a), 1381 Sh.
- Sharaf al-Dīn Mūsawī, Sayyid ʿAbd al-Ḥusayn. Al-Naṣṣ wa l-ijtihād. 1st edition. [n.p]: Sayyid al-Shuhadāʾ, 1404 AH.
- Tījānī Samāwī, Muḥammad. Thumma ihtadayt. [n.p]: Manshūrāt Madīnat al-ʿIlm, [n.d].
- Yūsufī Muqaddam, Muḥammad Ṣādiq. Darāmadī bar ijtihād az manẓar-i Qurʾān. Qom: Būstān-i Kitāb, 1387 Sh.